Mafia: Chaos in the Kingdom of Tuz (11 Viewers)

[Klin]

He did, to who?

Zach

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Hængebøffer]

Tomorrow I'll go out for dinner and a movie. I'll probably post my vote during the day, but I won't be much active.

 

[Klin]

Btw, this is the laziest game I've seen from Osman.

 

[Hængebøffer]

He did, to who?

Zach.

 

[Klin]

@king Ale, speak!

 

[Osman]

Zach

Gs spread their votes to blend in, but if it's a tactic, they usually do it earlier, it's too noticeable to do it at the deadline, unless the vote has a real use (like ones on CK) . This one on Zach was pointless though.

 

[Völler]

Because they assumed his low key style made him a more likely special C role? (aka D) I don't know who he interacted with or how. Quote all of radekas posts in your next post.

I'm not quoting all of radekas' posts for you. Why do you think they didn't whack you?

Tomorrow I'll go out for dinner and a movie. I'll probably post my vote during the day, but I won't be much active.

What movie? With whom? Post pics of tickets pls.

 

[Osman]

Btw, this is the laziest game I've seen from Osman.

This is the best game I seen from you.


Which says nothing

 

[Klin]

Gs spread their votes to blend in, but if it's a tactic, they usually do it earlier, it's too noticeable to do it at the deadline, unless the vote has a real use (like ones on CK) . This one on Zach was pointless though.

I know.

 

[Hængebøffer]

Gs spread their votes to blend in, but if it's a tactic, they usually do it earlier, it's too noticeable to do it at the deadline, unless the vote has a real use (like ones on CK) . This one on Zach was pointless though.

You might be right.

 

[Klin]

This is the best game I seen from you.


Which says nothing

Fuck you.

 

[Osman]

I'm not quoting all of radekas' posts for you. Why do you think they didn't whack you?



What movie? With whom? Post pics of tickets pls.

Because they assumed I'm too loud in the thread to be the detective (first night or two is mainly about gambling on likely D profiles) , plus I had 4 votes on me and it was unclear who was biting it.

And you lazy mofo, If you won't do that, tell me then, why was radekas whacked?

 

[Klin]

Man I have over 120 posts in this thread. I need to sleep.

Good night @Fred, @Osman, @Maddy and @j0ker.

 

[Völler]

Man I have over 120 posts in this thread. I need to sleep.

Good night @Fred, @Osman, @Maddy and @j0ker.

Fuck you.

 

[Klin]

Fuck you.

Love you babe.

 

[Osman]

You might be right.

But at the same time, JCk is a free spirit and someone who would do whatever he wants, so he would possibly do this as a G anyways. It's just that vote in itself isn't suspicious.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Because they assumed I'm too loud in the thread to be the detective (first night or two is mainly about gambling on likely D profiles) , plus I had 4 votes on me and it was unclear who was biting it.

And you lazy mofo, If you won't do that, tell me then, why was radekas whacked?

Because they assumed his low key style made him a more likely special C role? (aka D) I don't know who he interacted with or how. Quote all of radekas posts in your next post.

Why do you keep asking why radekas was whacked when you have your theory right there?

 

[Osman]

Why do you keep asking why radekas was whacked when you have your theory right there?

Because it's interesting that Völler asks but didn't share his own thoughts? Regardless of assuming the obvious (whacks are just role of a diece especially in first day), peeps have different takes and notice behaviours or posts in different lights.

For example I don't remember radekas posts so don't recall if he interacted with a possible G, or posted in certain way. Maybe someone else noticed something.

 

[Völler]

Because they assumed I'm too loud in the thread to be the detective (first night or two is mainly about gambling on likely D profiles) , plus I had 4 votes on me and it was unclear who was biting it.

And you lazy mofo, If you won't so that, tell me then, why was radekas whacked?

Personally I think the main reason is that he's a good poster, but one who wasn't too vocal. There are better players out there though. But while some of the better ones might have been onto something with their accusations, whacking radekas wouldn't have any downsides. Of course, him being pretty quiet could also mean that he could be a potential special, as you also say.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Because they assumed I'm too loud in the thread to be the detective (first night or two is mainly about gambling on likely D profiles) , plus I had 4 votes on me and it was unclear who was biting it.

And you lazy mofo, If you won't do that, tell me then, why was radekas whacked?

Because it's interesting that Völler asks but didn't share his own thoughts? Regardless of assuming the obvious (whacks are just role of a diece especially in first day), peeps have different takes and notice behaviours or posts in different lights.

For example I don't remember radekas posts so don't recall if he interacted with a possible G, or posted in certain way. Maybe someone else noticed something.

Fair enough.