Mafia 2020 v2 || The FANATIC (17 Viewers)

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,493
Seeing how everyone has opted against the no lynch tactic then I am going to vote for the primary suspect Mr Chocolate.
Let's hope for the best.
Edit. King Ale should be next.
You went from a principled no lynch vote no one was following you on, to suddenly Mr Chocolate as soon as the votes piled on King Ale?
 

Klin

نحن الروبوتات
May 27, 2009
61,692
Well Tomice and Voller


both think they saw her in the sign up thread a few days ago, directly contradicting her story, but they cannot be so sure, so its word against word

I've already gone through my reasoning as to why i did it now and not last game, it honestly did not cross my mind, in hindsight my logic may have been wrong and the invis looks very bad, but i stand by my reasoning at the time, even as a standard C.
Just to clarify, no one thinks anything. I can confirm that I saw king Ale was lurking in the last mafia thread, meaning that her visibility was on. I'm not Nostradamus, she even posted in the same thread later. Her argument is that she turned it off later, before the roles were assigned.

Considering this, the fact that we can't prove otherwise for now and that Mr. Chocolate turned it off during the game, it does not make sense voting for her today. All those voting for her are considered extremely suspicious right now.

- - - Updated - - -

good point King Ale
What are you doing voting for her?

- - - Updated - - -

OK :tup:
 

kappa96

Senior Member
Jun 20, 2018
7,469
You went from a principled no lynch vote no one was following you on, to suddenly Mr Chocolate as soon as the votes piled on King Ale?
it didn't gain any traction and as you probably know, he did vote for me . that weighted a little i admit .
also he is a prime suspect along with king ale . i nominated both of them a long time ago.
as i already said if at least 2 people would vote for it(no lynch), i would change it back.
i still think it's the best case scenario, but the other posters found it boring, so now we do it their way.
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,797
They accuse me of changing my visibility after the game, to which there is only one defense: I didn't. Changing the visibility mode during the game or after the roles are assigned is very suspicious so if someone thinks they have seen me visible sometime before the game, they have reason to think I switched modes after the game, but I have played this game enough to never do that.

The second part of your post is rich coming from you :p
See this is more like you attack attack attack

Alright im willing to change my vote to mr chocolate, hoping the D looks into you as i really think you are acting off
 

king Ale

Senior Member
Oct 28, 2004
21,689
This makes little sense.

We accused you of lying about when you changed your status. You said last week when both Voller and I think you did it in the last couple of days.

No one said you did it after the roles were given
Your order of events is wrong. I mentioned "last week" after Voller implied that I did it after the game when he said he'll vote for me because of it. I responded that I did it way before the roles were assigned, which is what I did. I can't know exactly when, but I realized my status was visible when Klin mentioned it in the previous mafia game and it was when and why I checked and changed it.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,493
Your order of events is wrong. I mentioned "last week" after Voller implied that I did it after the game when he said he'll vote for me because of it. I responded that I did it way before the roles were assigned, which is what I did. I can't know exactly when, but I realized my status was visible when Klin mentioned it in the previous mafia game and it was when and why I checked and changed it.

Your visible status put aside, who do you find even slightly more suspicious then before after all this back and forth today with the votes/sudden apearances by some?
 

kappa96

Senior Member
Jun 20, 2018
7,469
You went from a principled no lynch vote no one was following you on, to suddenly Mr Chocolate as soon as the votes piled on King Ale?
also i remeber you somhow agreeing with me and quarel with radekas about it , yet when was time to vote you didn't vote for no lynch.
 

Tomice

Senior Member
Mar 25, 2009
3,024
Your order of events is wrong. I mentioned "last week" after Voller implied that I did it after the game when he said he'll vote for me because of it. I responded that I did it way before the roles were assigned, which is what I did. I can't know exactly when, but I realized my status was visible when Klin mentioned it in the previous mafia game and it was when and why I checked and changed it.

You have changed your invisibility setting. I'm gonna vote for you. :D
Because they are good/popular players.

- - - Updated - - -

When did I do that? :rolleyes2:
You tell me. When did you do that?
Way before I became wife to Gordo.
Can you be more specific?
What are you on about. Why won't you tell me when you changed the invisibility mode? :D
Last week I believe :D
Where did Voller implay you did it after the roles were given?

I specifically waited for you to give an answer before I jumped in cause I was at that point pretty sure I saw you with it on two days prior
 
OP
piotrr

piotrr

Мodеrator
Sep 13, 2011
34,009
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #371
    1h until the deadline.

    Mr. Chocolate (8) - king Ale, Radekas, Quetz, kappa96, ILFJ, Kyle, Klin, GordoDeCentral
    king Ale (2) - Völler, , Mr Chocolate,
    Snobist (3) - Tomice, Ronn, campionesidd
    No Lynch (1) - Snobist
    Osman (1) - ALC


    Fr3sh, Osman are yet to vote.

    --
    Alen is in jail and his vote does not count.
     

    Osman

    Koul Khara!
    Aug 30, 2002
    61,493
    also i remeber you somhow agreeing with me and quarel with radekas about it , yet when was time to vote you didn't vote for no lynch.

    I said from the get go I do NOT think no lynch is good idea for this big game, and I never liked in the past, even the times I voted for it, for the little info it gives you despite the extra day of security when its urgently needed in a small game. But what I disagreed with radekas on was his ludicrous notion that no lynch is good for the Gs and and its suspicious to promote it actively, its the reverse, its the least they want because their ideal scenario its whats happening now over no one being lynched.


    Whats more suspicious is to pay lipservice to it, or be your go-to-act as its been for you so far, but suddenly change from it just as it happens to be that votes piled on King Ale.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 17)