I said from the get go I do NOT think no lynch is good idea for this big game, and I never liked in the past, even the times I voted for it, for the little info it gives you despite the extra day of security when its urgently needed in a small game. But what I disagreed with radekas on was his ludicrous notion that no lynch is good for the Gs and and its suspicious to promote it actively, its the reverse, its the least they want because their ideal scenario its whats happening now over no one being lynched.
Whats more suspicious is to pay lipservice to it, or be your go-to-act as its been for you so far, but suddenly change from it just as it happens to be that votes piled on King Ale.
Whats more suspicious is to pay lipservice to it, or be your go-to-act as its been for you so far, but suddenly change from it just as it happens to be that votes piled on King Ale.
