Yeah went over the link again, point stands just the same
- - - Updated - - -
but I went and voted Klin, which was a 100% G according to that post, what's your problem with me? it's not like I decided to give a petty no vote or something. yeah, you went after Maddy who turned out to be a G, but you also went after Klin and it had nothing to do with my proposal.
It's not good enough honestly. I was just expecting more from you since you were the only other active player beside me and Klin, who was himself a candidate for a lynch. ALC was gone, Radekas Jailed. Was I supposed to have a discussion with myself? everyone else were either a first time players ,not very active or a suspected G.
In a situation like this you should have helped me and get the other C's to cooperate so we can have a discussion on who is more likely G. Monty.Maddy or Klin. Having a discussion like that is exactly how you smoke out the G's. It was the best chance we had since the start since we had 2 G's in there out of 3 possible candidates.
I hope you agree that this was the most detailed and logical acquisition made in the game at that point unless I'm missing something. It was the best we had to work with and it frustrated me I had no one to exchange arguments with cause you were busy with the jailer thing and there was basically no one else. Can you at least understand why I found it extremely frustrating and tried so hard to convince you to let the jailer thing go? it was a waste of time cause it gained no traction, just like my idea then but I let it go just as fast' it wasn't at that point your Idea or mine. You didn't let go of yours which is also why almost everyone though you were a G.
If you and me at that point could have come to an agreement on Maddy we would had the power to pull all C's where we wanted to. I did it almost by myself but I didn't believe I wold mange to do it against Maddy so I had to choose you someone else.
In retrospect I could have gone for Monty but it's water under the bridge, I wasn't thinking straight at that point anymore cause I wanted to win but was exhausted from trying to convince everyone to vote together logicly. I had to do it cause no one read my post and gave me a hand voluntarily trying to get everyone on board.
To win this game you need at least 2-3 players who are willing to work together, even at the risk of one of them being a G. You just can't get anything done as a single player and I thought you would understand that, when it seemed like you didn't in my mind you were doing it on purpose and only then I added you to the vote. Do you see why it was an understandable mistake by me and everyone else?
I had Kiln but it was too late, we both wasted too much time suspecting each other.
I might been hard on you but looking at the way you played I assumed you do know how to play, I could be wrong as I don't remember how many games we played. Please, please tell me any of this is making sense and i didn't just completely wasted my time, although I love the challenge as you can guess.