LIVE - Last hours of mercato (16 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
OP

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
97,654
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #505
    Must some some financial BS thing and we'll never see him hit the pitch with a Juve jersey. Buying kids born in 94 unless they are already "stars" is a no-no for me. We must be buying 97-98...so this is just some book balancing shit.
     

    KB824

    Senior Member
    Sep 16, 2003
    31,789
    When we were getting Vucinic, he averaged 11, 19, 17, 14 goals/season with Roma.
    Osvaldo averaged 3,17,11,14.
    It really isnt any contest, the difference favors Vucinic far too much...
    When you consider that Vucinic played far more matches, yes. Or does the number of matches played not matter to you at all?
     

    Cronios

    Juventolog
    Jun 7, 2004
    27,519
    When you consider that Vucinic played far more matches, yes. Or does the number of matches played not matter to you at all?
    Everything matters, but what matters the most is the competition, you cant compare a season at Roma without competition, playing as the lone striker, with a season at Juve having to compete with Tevez and Llorente.
    So their Roma days are somewhat comparable, thats why it makes sense comparing them.
    Again, i repeat that i never really rated any of them as finishers. They are not good enough to be our starters IMO, but Vucinic's case was easier back then, he took his chances and averaged close to 15goals for 4 seasons.
    Osvaldo only had just one good season, just that!
     

    KB824

    Senior Member
    Sep 16, 2003
    31,789
    Everything matters, but what matters the most is the competition, you cant compare a season at Roma without competition, playing as the lone striker, with a season at Juve having to compete with Tevez and Llorente.
    So their Roma days are somewhat comparable, thats why it makes sense comparing them.
    Again, i repeat that i never really rated any of them as finishers. They are not good enough to be our starters IMO, but Vucinic's case was easier back then, he took his chances and averaged close to 15goals for 4 seasons.
    Osvaldo only had just one good season, just that!
    So let me get this straight. You are telling me right now that Vucinic had comepetition from Tevez and Llorente last season? And you are also telling me that Totti didn't play almost 40 matches last year, and Destro played over 25?


    That's your argument?


    I'm done.
     

    Post Ironic

    Senior Member
    Feb 9, 2013
    42,253
    So let me get this straight. You are telling me right now that Vucinic had comepetition from Tevez and Llorente last season? And you are also telling me that Totti didn't play almost 40 matches last year, and Destro played over 25?


    That's your argument?


    I'm done.
    :lol:

    Cronios-speak is synonymous with the abandonment of all logic.

    Years blend together for Cronios. Perhaps Vucinic had competition from Trezeguet and Baggio and even Omar Sivori's ghost as well over the past few years.

    Destro was still a child last year, and Totti had retired already, and Roma really only had a single striker on their roster last year in Cronios-speak.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 12)