They are both mediocre goal scoarers, but Vucinic was more proven.
In many occassions he was close to 15goals /season, which is half decent for a finisher, while Osvaldo was a one season wonder for the 2012-2013 season...
They are both mediocre goal scoarers, but Vucinic was more proven.
In many occassions he was close to 15goals /season, which is half decent for a finisher, while Osvaldo was a one season wonder for the 2012-2013 season...
More proven because he has been doing this for 2 years longer?
And again, it's amazing how you can't see the numbers right in fornt of you. Osvaldo averages just slightly more than 1 goal every 2 games over the past three full seasons, which hold more weight than what either one of them did 5-7 years ago.
"Vučinić scored on an exceptional 32 meter strike in extra time to help Juventus to a 2–2 draw against Milan on 20 March 2012, helping his side to a 4-3 victory on aggregate and progression to the 2012 Coppa Italia Final"
"Vučinić scored on an exceptional 32 meter strike in extra time to help Juventus to a 2–2 draw against Milan on 20 March 2012, helping his side to a 4-3 victory on aggregate and progression to the 2012 Coppa Italia Final"
When we were getting Vucinic, he averaged 11, 19, 17, 14 goals/season with Roma.
Osvaldo averaged 3,17,11,14.
It really isnt any contest, the difference favors Vucinic far too much...