You can't argue with someone who's name is ____4Azzurri.
I mean, first of all, there is no creativity in that. And secondly, somebody with such a username is of course not going to think rationally on this topic.
So really, there isn't much sense in arguing with blind individuals.
Oh please. What are you? The law maker of fans? Did you write the rule book? Or are you a bitter English fan who's pissed his nation isn't going to win a WC & believes all his fellow country men should suffer like you do?
Its the same as supporting two teams, or changing teams and following the one who wins. You can do it if you like, but most football fans will give you flak for it.
Geez how does one forget the 2006 World Cup? perhaps because it's mentioned in nearly every single thread. I cannot wait for somebody else to win next years world cup because I'm sick of the 2006 World Cup being mentioned as a viewpoint in all Azzuri arguments. Wonder how nobody mentions Euro 2008 when Spain completly outclassed Italy? or why Australia got robbed in the 2006 World Cup? or even why France dominated most parts of the final.
By the way I do not condone the English mentality of constant referalls to winning the 1966 World Cup, hence why I never bring that into arguments. I just don't understand why we need to bring 2006 into every debate.
We should just turn this thread into a "Kits of the World Cup" thread. Kind of like what black people did with the word Nigger. We'll make a negative, positive. So that in a way this thread will become the Juventuz Nigger.
Geez how does one forget the 2006 World Cup? perhaps because it's mentioned in nearly every single thread. I cannot wait for somebody else to win next years world cup because I'm sick of the 2006 World Cup being mentioned as a viewpoint in all Azzuri arguments. Wonder how nobody mentions Euro 2008 when Spain completly outclassed Italy? or why Australia got robbed in the 2006 World Cup? or even why France dominated most parts of the final.
By the way I do not condone the English mentality of constant referalls to winning the 1966 World Cup, hence why I never bring that into arguments. I just don't understand why we need to bring 2006 into every debate.