What Candreva did is better than Martinez. Although i like Candreva and thought he has potential.. He is not doing much for us, it's not like he is sensational for us.. And his price is more expensive.. 7m for just his half rights mean 14m to buy him..
And why you say it's easier to do better for Catania? I thought it will be easier to score or shine in a bigger club like some people's theory here about it's easy for Eto'o to score goals for Barca while there is Xavi and Messi.. And so why Candreva did not do better in Udinese and Livorno?
Well, Candreva was already playing in Juve, in one of their worst season, but he co-oped with the pressure, showed promises and actually looked good in a shet team.
Scored a 30 something yards out cracker and was part of some of our goals during his half season loan spell here eventhough came as a sub in most of the games he played.
He's 4 years younger, versatile in midfield (could have covered 4th choice CM for us now) and is also Italian (ItalJuve project obviously LOL).
Now when you have this option why would you go and gamble the money on a Catania "beast" who's 27 now and who knows he might still be injured from last season. We issued his price when infact Martinez was only 2mil cheaper.
And yes it's easier to shine at Catania because you can't compare the pressure on players in bigger teams. different objectives in diffrent clubs (Juve and Catania in this case)
Note: Again I'm not saying Martinez is a horrible player I just see Candreva as the better purchase.