João Cancelo (14 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
Yeah but Im not that enthusiastic about his replacement Trippier... I think I rather see Spinazzola (Who IMO is very underrated) starting..
Then again even if we do not take Trippier we still have to get a RB/LB type of player as A.Sandro Spinazzola and MDS are the only ones available for these positions unless you consider Romero as RB..
- - - Updated - - -
Why is he carrying L.Sane`s son?!
Then again even if we do not take Trippier we still have to get a RB/LB type of player as A.Sandro Spinazzola and MDS are the only ones available for these positions unless you consider Romero as RB..
- - - Updated - - -
Didn't find any of that. But found this:
And this is his gf: https://www.instagram.com/danielalexmachado/
And this is his gf: https://www.instagram.com/danielalexmachado/
If we are selling Cancelo it's because Sarri use a defensive right back who stays deep opposite to a very attacking Left back.
And we all know by now that he can't defend.
The fact that cancelo value is too high to sit on the bench and he wont be used much in his natural position makes his sale a no brainer.
The only way he stays is if Sarri decide to use him as a pure winger , he just dosnt fit as a RB in his system.
And we all know by now that he can't defend.
The fact that cancelo value is too high to sit on the bench and he wont be used much in his natural position makes his sale a no brainer.
The only way he stays is if Sarri decide to use him as a pure winger , he just dosnt fit as a RB in his system.
Last edited:
Not about the side of attacking imo, he usually use an inverted forward on the left flank who drifts to the center, as a result the LB has space to push high and wide on the left. On the right side the winger stays wide and slightly deeper so the RB also stays deeper.
So in the end it mostly depends on the side of the inverted foreword if we play 4-3-3 and I think CR will play that role. Any other formation and you are right
- - - Updated - - -
I Just think he believes in his system and very committed to play his way and the type of coach to ask players to adept rather then adept to the players, also why he failed at Chelsea imo. I Can't see him coming here to re-invent himself.
It's surely a possibility he plays 4-3-1-2 as well like in Empoli but I find it less likely unless we bring in another technical mid for a starting role.
So in the end it mostly depends on the side of the inverted foreword if we play 4-3-3 and I think CR will play that role. Any other formation and you are right
- - - Updated - - -
I Just think he believes in his system and very committed to play his way and the type of coach to ask players to adept rather then adept to the players, also why he failed at Chelsea imo. I Can't see him coming here to re-invent himself.
It's surely a possibility he plays 4-3-1-2 as well like in Empoli but I find it less likely unless we bring in another technical mid for a starting role.
Last edited:
