Jankulovski finally signs?? (2 Viewers)

Dominic

Senior Member
Jan 30, 2004
15,343
#1
According to sports.it udinese have finally agreed to Juve's latest offer: 4 or 6 million + Giorgio Chiellini(this is probably a co-ownership deal, as I can't see us selling him yet) for Jankulovski.

Sports.it are writing it down as if the (also) long Jankulovski saga is over!..
 

delpiero10

Senior Member
Apr 5, 2004
1,158
#5
I think it is a good deal, not much at all, but i simply cant see what use there is for him. Zambrotta is best as a LB and Capello insists that he will continue to be a LB end of story. Use the money on Bonera.
 

A_LAcki

Senior Member
Dec 23, 2002
3,554
#6
Mutu and Jankulovski were desired players by me, now we only have to sign one or two defenders (depends on who will go)
 

Zlatan

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2003
23,032
#10
++ [ originally posted by Dominic ] ++
It is 4 or 6 million Euro's though and not pounds.
Yeah, but it's the co-ownership of Chiellini I'm not thrilled about. If it was a loan than OK, or if it was a primavera player. We did pay 6 mil € for him you know, that was a rip off in itself. I really wanted to see what he could do, and had he stayed it would have given us more tactical options.
 
OP
OP
Dominic

Dominic

Senior Member
Jan 30, 2004
15,343
#11
++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++


Yeah, but it's the co-ownership of Chiellini I'm not thrilled about. If it was a loan than OK, or if it was a primavera player. We did pay 6 mil € for him you know, that was a rip off in itself. I really wanted to see what he could do, and had he stayed it would have given us more tactical options.

Yeah I know, I'm not sure it is a co-ownership though. I presumed it would be, can't see us selling him completely and Udinese want a lot.

I agree about wanting to keep Chiellini.
 

Erkka

Senior Member
Mar 31, 2004
3,863
#13
++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++


Yeah, but it's the co-ownership of Chiellini I'm not thrilled about. If it was a loan than OK, or if it was a primavera player. We did pay 6 mil € for him you know, that was a rip off in itself. I really wanted to see what he could do, and had he stayed it would have given us more tactical options.
same here, I wish that we would have sold Brighi to Udine instead...
 

Nekton

Senior Member
Oct 22, 2001
1,220
#14
Buffon

zebina-thuram-legro

janku-emerson-blasi-zambro

nedved

mutu-trez

Not bad IMO. Could use another central defender though, cordoba/adani/campbell etc.
 

Erkka

Senior Member
Mar 31, 2004
3,863
#15
++ [ originally posted by Nekton ] ++
Buffon

zebina-thuram-legro

janku-emerson-blasi-zambro

nedved

mutu-trez

Not bad IMO. Could use another central defender though, cordoba/adani/campbell etc.
not very realistic though, DP will play no matter what... And Janku on the right side?! Well, I have doubts this defence...
 

Zlatan

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2003
23,032
#16
----------Mutu Trezeguet---------------

---------------Nedved------------------

-----------Emerson Blasi Zambrotta

Jankulovski Thuram Leggrotaglie Oddo

-----------------Buffon------------
 

Nekton

Senior Member
Oct 22, 2001
1,220
#17
++ [ originally posted by Poku ] ++
not very realistic though, DP will play no matter what... And Janku on the right side?! Well, I have doubts this defence...
More like this when defending, janku and zambro are both very versatile:

Buffon

janku-zebina-thuram-legro-zambro

emerson-blasi-nedved

Mutu

trez
 

Nekton

Senior Member
Oct 22, 2001
1,220
#19
He's cheap, don't mind the bench and a lot better than most people try to make him :) I'd rather have him on the bench than Iuliano, Ferrara, Tudor and Montero. Probably have a tough fight against Legro for a starting position too in my eleven.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)