You are becoming a real pain with your pointless negativity. Not only is your post illegible it also makes no sense....
Anfield, 45,000 seats. Home to the most successful club in English football and recent CL finalists and winners.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anfield
Stamford Bridge, 41,000 seats. Home to recent double winners and CL finalists Chelsea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stamford_Bridge_(stadium)
Stade De Gerland, 40,000 seats. Home to the most successful french team of recent years and regular competitors in the CL latter stages.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stade_de_Gerland
I could go on but it's not worth it because you wont listen anyway. A smaller stadium is more intense, and it can become a fortress if the fans are passionate. Look at Arsenal, they were invincible at highbury, a ground with a smaller capacity to our new stadium, because the fans were passionate and not diluted, since their move to the emirates they have struggled to create the same vibe and the players themselves have even criticised it. 41,000 is a good number.
Anfield, 45,000 seats. Home to the most successful club in English football and recent CL finalists and winners.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anfield
Stamford Bridge, 41,000 seats. Home to recent double winners and CL finalists Chelsea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stamford_Bridge_(stadium)
Stade De Gerland, 40,000 seats. Home to the most successful french team of recent years and regular competitors in the CL latter stages.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stade_de_Gerland
I could go on but it's not worth it because you wont listen anyway. A smaller stadium is more intense, and it can become a fortress if the fans are passionate. Look at Arsenal, they were invincible at highbury, a ground with a smaller capacity to our new stadium, because the fans were passionate and not diluted, since their move to the emirates they have struggled to create the same vibe and the players themselves have even criticised it. 41,000 is a good number.

