It's official, Craig the new Bond (1 Viewer)

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,108
#1
All AP Movie News

Daniel Craig Unveiled As New James Bond
Friday October 14 8:54 AM ET

Blond. James Blond.

Daniel Craig, a 37-year-old, sandy-haired Englishman was introduced Friday as the new James Bond, ending months of speculation.

His selection was revealed as he was whisked down the Thames River aboard a military Rigid Raider boat to a news conference.


Craig replaces Pierce Brosnan in the role of the suave spy in "Casino Royale," due in theaters next year.

"It is a huge iconic figure in movie history, and those things don't come along very often," the star said, after posing for photos with producer Barbara Broccoli and director Martin Campbell.

Craig revealed he only discovered on Monday that he had definitely been given the role and had to consider the offer.

"It was difficult, but I tried to think about it like any other job. We have got an incredible script, and that is my first line of attack. Once I had read it, I knew I did not have any choice," he said. "It is a huge challenge, and I think life is about challenges."

The film's producers tried to keep their decision secret, but Craig's mother told the tabloid Sun newspaper she was "thrilled to bits."

Craig is the first blond actor and only the second Englishman to star as Agent 007 in the movie series. (Roger Moore played Bond in seven films from 1973-85.)

Relatively unknown outside Britain, Craig appeared in the landmark 1990s British TV drama "Our Friends in the North" and in films including "The Mother," "Enduring Love" and "Layer Cake."

He played Paul Newman's sinister son in "Road to Perdition," was poet Ted Hughes opposite Gwyneth Paltrow's Sylvia Plath in "Sylvia" and starred in this year's thriller "The Jacket" with Adrien Brody.

Craig is also the tabloids' dream Bond. He once dated headline-grabbing model Kate Moss and has been linked to Sienna Miller, his "Layer Cake" co-star and on-off fiancee of Jude Law.

Producers announced last year that a replacement was being sought for Brosnan, who played Bond in the last four films.

"Daniel is a superb actor who has all the qualities needed to bring a contemporary edge to the role," Broccoli and Campbell said in a statement.

Ian Fleming's first Bond novel, originally published in 1953, "Casino Royale" is one of the few Bond adventures not to feature the MI6 gadget-maker Q. It was previously filmed as a 1967 spoof starring Peter Sellers.

Before Friday, speculation about the new Bond also included British actors Clive Owen, Ioan Gruffudd, Colin Firth, Hugh Grant, Gerard Butler and Ewan McGregor, Irishman Colin Farrell and Australians Hugh Jackman, Heath Ledger and Eric Bana.

"I am looking most forward to actually starting getting on with it, and feeling intimidated about pretty much everything," Craig said. "It is a sort of responsibility, but it is also a huge adventure. I want to get as much out of it as I can."

Campbell said the movie would be "tougher and grittier" with "more character and less gadgets." He said the story would begin with Bond first becoming a "00" agent.

"It is really the arc in which he becomes Bond," Campbell said. "He starts out just having earned his double-0 stripes and comes out at the end the Bond we know and love."
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
#10
++ [ originally posted by Altair ] ++
it seems we have common tastes ;).. do you think that was the best choice ?


Havent seen much of Daniel Craig, but I think it was a good casting choice to stick with a Brit. Orlando Bloom would've messed it up. Hugh Jackman and Eric Bana though seemed like worthy contenders.
 
OP
GordoDeCentral

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,108
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #11
    i heard hugh jackman made up the story of being a potential candidate to boost his resume but the people from fleming inc went out public calling him a liar. As far as bloom that is a joke. I personally think bale woulda made a great bond.
     

    Desmond

    Senior Member
    Jul 12, 2002
    8,938
    #13
    ++ [ originally posted by Altair ] ++
    I personally think bale woulda made a great bond.
    Do you think it'd be healthy for him to be the leading man for two huge franchises though, namely Batman and Bond?

    Personally I wouldn't have minded Brosnan for another instalment.
     
    OP
    GordoDeCentral

    GordoDeCentral

    Diez
    Moderator
    Apr 14, 2005
    70,108
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #14
    ++ [ originally posted by Desmond ] ++

    Do you think it'd be healthy for him to be the leading man for two huge franchises though, namely Batman and Bond?

    Personally I wouldn't have minded Brosnan for another instalment.

    no you're absolutely right, he couldn't. But i just thought he'd be a good bond. as far as pierce there are two main reasons why he was put aside: one, the relationship between the two parties just worsened; secondly the whole franchiose is moving in a new direction with tougher less techy so a change was imperative.
     

    Torkel

    f(s+1)=3((s +1)-1=3s
    Jul 12, 2002
    3,537
    #17
    ++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++
    I think Ewan McGregor will make a good Bond.
    ?! It's not a musical!

    I don't know the hell this guy is, and that's smart I think. It wouldn't have worked with some guy that people would connect with a lot of previous roles.
     

    mikhail

    Senior Member
    Jan 24, 2003
    9,576
    #18
    I don't know Craig at all. I've seen photos, his filmography (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0185819/), but I've never seen any of his films baring Tomb Raider (which I don't remember very well - suspect AJ may have grabbed most of my attention away from an otherwise awful movie).

    Maybe that's good, maybe it's not. An established actor could have worked too. Bale was mentioned as an impossible dream. He did a great job with Batman, and I hope he sticks with that role for another couple of movies.

    Brosnan was getting too old for the job and if a new direction was required, letting him go now can't hurt.

    Honestly, I think the formula for the Bond films, so successfully established in Goldeneye (mmm... Famke Janssen), is getting tired. The gadgets in the last film were silly (an invisible car? FFS), the Bond girl, premise, plot, music, action, etc. were all rubbish. What really did work was the opening scene, with bond captured, tortured, etc. I'd love to see a Bond film get a bit more gritty, realistic. The Bourne movies have pushed my expectations for what Bond can be through the roof.

    Here's hoping for a director with real vision and a team behind him capable of making it come true.
     

    baggio

    Senior Member
    Jun 3, 2003
    19,250
    #19
    Yea, its sort of what happened to the Batman franchise. I think the new direction is better in the long run and stands them in good stead. After all, there is only so much super technology one can show on screen and keep the storyline gripping enough at the same time.
     

    Desmond

    Senior Member
    Jul 12, 2002
    8,938
    #20
    ++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++
    I think Ewan McGregor will make a good Bond.
    I think he is (or at least looks) a little too young for Bond, and if gritty is the way to go Ewan wouldn't be the best candidate IMO.

    Oh, and the accent too.:D
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)