Lol, I don't think you understood me but I guess I wasn't clear enough over this.
It doesn't matter to me if it's two days or two years. It's not up to you nor up to me to decide how much is enough. You say 6 months is ok which is bullshit because someone else could come in and say it's injustice, 3 months is enough. Another one could say one month. Your opinion is as good as the other two guys. Everything is relative, you have no monopoly on being right. Justice doesn't exist, because everything is relative since those are just people who make decisions. One will be satisfied while another will not. It's not decidable if we get into details.
There should be a paragraph for actions like this so everyone would know what awaits him/her for breaking the law. If you don't accept the law, you can leave it's as simple as that. If you break the law, face the consequences.
Also you can't say 6 months is enough because somewhere else someone got a punishment like this. For example: there are places in the World where you just get deported for illegally crossing a state's border but there are also places where you get a death punishment for this. Again, everything is relative and you have no monopoly on being right. In fact in this situation FIGC has (or some other institution created by government, who have monopoly on stating the law).
Punishment always have two purposes: punishing the guilty for breaking the law (here we assume that he'll learn his lesson and won't do that in the future) and making up for the loss of victim (obviously) but ALSO making an example, so others don't try to do that thing. Whether you like it or not it's like that, because government or any other institution want to have less and less cases happening. Otherwise people won't feel safe and probably leave (I'm more about state now but it works in pretty much the same way).
It doesn't matter to me if it's two days or two years. It's not up to you nor up to me to decide how much is enough. You say 6 months is ok which is bullshit because someone else could come in and say it's injustice, 3 months is enough. Another one could say one month. Your opinion is as good as the other two guys. Everything is relative, you have no monopoly on being right. Justice doesn't exist, because everything is relative since those are just people who make decisions. One will be satisfied while another will not. It's not decidable if we get into details.
There should be a paragraph for actions like this so everyone would know what awaits him/her for breaking the law. If you don't accept the law, you can leave it's as simple as that. If you break the law, face the consequences.
Also you can't say 6 months is enough because somewhere else someone got a punishment like this. For example: there are places in the World where you just get deported for illegally crossing a state's border but there are also places where you get a death punishment for this. Again, everything is relative and you have no monopoly on being right. In fact in this situation FIGC has (or some other institution created by government, who have monopoly on stating the law).
Punishment always have two purposes: punishing the guilty for breaking the law (here we assume that he'll learn his lesson and won't do that in the future) and making up for the loss of victim (obviously) but ALSO making an example, so others don't try to do that thing. Whether you like it or not it's like that, because government or any other institution want to have less and less cases happening. Otherwise people won't feel safe and probably leave (I'm more about state now but it works in pretty much the same way).
Buy on AliExpress.com
