[ITA] Serie A 2015/2016 (35 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
35,102
Dzeko is more prolific than Mandzukic, one can't deny that but they are two strikers pretty much on the same level.
Anyway with Dzeko, Salah and possibly a fullback, Roma definitely look like title contenders.
 

Cheesio

**********
Jul 11, 2006
22,514
More prolific, more technically gifted, contribute muche more to the play....Dzeko is definetely the better player and i think he will excel at Roma.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,994
More prolific, more technically gifted, contribute muche more to the play....Dzeko is definetely the better player and i think he will excel at Roma.
Dzeko
2014-15: 32P / 6G / 4A / 1553 - 258.8
2013-14: 48P / 26G / 16A / 3235 - 124.4
2012-13: 45P / 15G / 7A / 2518 - 167.9
2011-12: 43P / 19G / 9A / 2402 - 126.4
2010-11: 40P / 17G / 6A / 3008 - 176.9
Total: 208 played / 83 goals / 42 assists / 12716 minutes - 153.2 minutes per goal (302.8 minutes per assist)


Mandzukic
2014-15: 43P / 20G / 5A / 3060 - 153.0
2013-14: 48P / 26G / 10A / 3311 - 127.3
2012-13: 40P / 22G / 4A / 2835 - 128.9
2011-12: 33P / 12G / 10A / 2798 - 233.2
2010-11: 28P / 10G / 3A / 1750 - 175.0
Total: 192 played / 90 goals / 32 assists / 13754 minutes - 152.8 minutes per goal (429.8 minutes per assist)

Dzeko is obviously better technically, better at team play. Both as prolific as each other over 5 seasons. Over 3 seasons Mandzukic is more prolific than Dzeko (135.4mpg vs 155.4mpg). Mandzukic is also less likely to be lying on a treatment table.
 

Cheesio

**********
Jul 11, 2006
22,514
Dzeko
2014-15: 32P / 6G / 4A / 1553 - 258.8
2013-14: 48P / 26G / 16A / 3235 - 124.4
2012-13: 45P / 15G / 7A / 2518 - 167.9
2011-12: 43P / 19G / 9A / 2402 - 126.4
2010-11: 40P / 17G / 6A / 3008 - 176.9
Total: 208 played / 83 goals / 42 assists / 12716 minutes - 153.2 minutes per goal (302.8 minutes per assist)


Mandzukic
2014-15: 43P / 20G / 5A / 3060 - 153.0
2013-14: 48P / 26G / 10A / 3311 - 127.3
2012-13: 40P / 22G / 4A / 2835 - 128.9
2011-12: 33P / 12G / 10A / 2798 - 233.2
2010-11: 28P / 10G / 3A / 1750 - 175.0
Total: 192 played / 90 goals / 32 assists / 13754 minutes - 152.8 minutes per goal (429.8 minutes per assist)

Dzeko is obviously better technically, better at team play. Both as prolific as each other over 5 seasons. Over 3 seasons Mandzukic is more prolific than Dzeko (135.4mpg vs 155.4mpg). Mandzukic is also less likely to be lying on a treatment table.
I am not a stats man, i trust my eyes when it comes to a player, stats like these don't factor type of the opposition, order of the goal, how many missed chances.....
Maybe Mandzu is as prolific as Dzeko but you can't deny that the bosnian is the better player. I think that Mandzukic fits us better as we will need his pressing and physical game with someone like Dybala and with Morata from time to time.

Conclusion, it will be good year for Calcio, we are weaker, other teams are definetely stronger, end of cycle for us, more i think of it i think this will be the year we lose the Scudetto.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,994
I am not a stats man, i trust my eyes when it comes to a player, stats like these don't factor type of the opposition, order of the goal, how many missed chances.....
Maybe Mandzu is as prolific as Dzeko but you can't deny that the bosnian is the better player. I think that Mandzukic fits us better as we will need his pressing and physical game with someone like Dybala and with Morata from time to time.

Conclusion, it will be good year for Calcio, we are weaker, other teams are definetely stronger, end of cycle for us, more i think of it i think this will be the year we lose the Scudetto.
He is the better footballer but then you always appreciate more technically gifted players. All I know is that Mandzukic is a very good striker, he's one of mentally strongest strikers out there, and I don't feel like we have missed a trick. We went for Dzeko in his prime and he turned us down, now he's not, which is why he's leaving City.
 

Bianconero_Aus

Beppe Marotta Is My God
May 26, 2009
81,135
Also, Mandzukic is much more a team player IMO, a one-man pressing machine, not just a static old fashioned penalty box striker. Mario isnt as technically skilled as Edin, but he works harder, gets himself in great positions, really good in the air, and is an absolute nuisance for defenders. He is also more of a big game player, and the best part for us, he has that same "cattiveria" that Tevez had.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,503
More prolific, more technically gifted, contribute muche more to the play....Dzeko is definetely the better player and i think he will excel at Roma.
Contribute more to the play? Since when? It's the complete opposite for long time now, Dzeko is lazy poacher for far too many years, a good one, but useless outside the box nowadays, this is the nr 1 gripe lot of Bosnians I know have with him.

While Mandzukic beside work rate is considerably more useful for general player, superior target man, goes wide (occasionally played winger) , supports his attacking partners, runs the channels well. And generally pretty much never stops working outside the box.

The last thing that should be said is Dzeko is better in general play, he is better technically and more of instinctive finisher, but not as complete team playing role player as Mandzukic, more of someone who waits til he can finish, despite having good technical qualities, not active outside the box much.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,994
By team play I think he means linking on a technical level, rather than traditional work as a team player.

Basically I think each team got a player who suits them, and I'm happy with Mandzukic, he's a horrible bastard who scores goals.
 

Vlad

In Allegri We Trust
May 23, 2011
24,058
Countless debates I've witnessed who's the better player between the two, usually these grow into something else where I come from.

Džeko might be lazy, doesn't work his ass off like Mandžukić, doesn't press the opponents, but he's more involved in general play, undoubtedly more technical and talented player, can beat his man and isn't solely dependent on others to provide service for him. He isn't some poacher ffs, waiting for others to provide without contributing. He decline in the last few years though.

Mandukić is bullying defenders throughout the game, at times forcing them to make errors and taking advantage on these, has better movement inside the box, good finisher, big game player and I think he's better fit for us in general. But he needs to get the right service. And NO he can't play wide.
 

Cheesio

**********
Jul 11, 2006
22,514
Contribute more to the play? Since when? It's the complete opposite for long time now, Dzeko is lazy poacher for far too many years, a good one, but useless outside the box nowadays, this is the nr 1 gripe lot of Bosnians I know have with him.

While Mandzukic beside work rate is considerably more useful for general player, superior target man, goes wide (occasionally played winger) , supports his attacking partners, runs the channels well. And generally pretty much never stops working outside the box.

The last thing that should be said is Dzeko is better in general play, he is better technically and more of instinctive finisher, but not as complete team playing role player as Mandzukic, more of someone who waits til he can finish, despite having good technical qualities, not active outside the box much.
Like JJ said by better game play, i meant he's better link up player because of superior technique, like i said i think Dzeko suits Roma better and Mandzu suit us better. I was just merely replying to the posts that claimed that Mandzukic was better than Dzeko.
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
All this is coming from a sociopath, ignorant one, with no life that for his personal amusement kept dummy account active for entire year along with many more. You should have been put away years ago. Mental institutions crave for people like you. You'd be undisputed king there.
if i were still a moderator i would tell you boys to calm down

try not to get so riled up. maybe take a piece of paper and make a nice cut out for each other
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,000
Well it seems Roma are finally trying to get rid of Totti...this might do them more good thany anyone can evaluate.
Yup

This summer (so far) Roma are in an atypical situation for them, because they didn't need to sell a star player in order to get money for new signings. They got 20m for that Bertolacci guy and are about to get +25m for Romagnoli. Both of them didn't even play for Roma last year.
This allows them to keep their strength intact (midfield of Pjanic, De Rossi, Nainggolan) and strengthen elsewhere. They got a solid keeper for free [Szczesny] and they invest the money where they were super thin, in attack.
Now, if they complete the likely transfers of Dzeko and Salah, they can have a strong, fast, technical and potent attacking trio of Gervinho, Dzeko, Salah. Or if they let Gervinho go, they still have Iturbe and Falque.
The defense is strengthened with the return of Castan. Florenzi will probably keep playing RB, where he did a very good job last season. The LB position is the weakness right now, but I read that they are working on this with some LB from PSG.
 

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
69,025
Yup

This summer (so far) Roma are in an atypical situation for them, because they didn't need to sell a star player in order to get money for new signings. They got 20m for that Bertolacci guy and are about to get +25m for Romagnoli. Both of them didn't even play for Roma last year.
This allows them to keep their strength intact (midfield of Pjanic, De Rossi, Nainggolan) and strengthen elsewhere. They got a solid keeper for free [Szczesny] and they invest the money where they were super thin, in attack.
Now, if they complete the likely transfers of Dzeko and Salah, they can have a strong, fast, technical and potent attacking trio of Gervinho, Dzeko, Salah. Or if they let Gervinho go, they still have Iturbe and Falque.
The defense is strengthened with the return of Castan. Florenzi will probably keep playing RB, where he did a very good job last season. The LB position is the weakness right now, but I read that they are working on this with some LB from PSG.
sabatini > marotta this summer
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 35)