If these are the good things about it I don't even wanna hear the bad ones.
This
NA: The North American league, rather than any sport governing body, determines the playing rules and scoring rules of its game, and the rules under which players join and change teams.
->communism
EU: The existence of an elected governing body to which clubs at all levels of the sport belong.
->democracy
NA: New teams may enter the competition only by a vote of current members; typically, a new place is put up for bid by would-be owners.
->wallet decides who enters the top league
EU: The promotion of well-performing teams to higher-level leagues or divisions and the relegation of poorly performing teams to lower-level leagues or divisions.
->performance decides who enters the top league
NA: Due to the unbalanced schedule typical in US and Canadian leagues, not all teams face the same opponents, and some teams may not meet during a regular season at all.
->NFC&AFC never meet
EU: Matches played both inside and outside of leagues
->diversity
NA: The league is organized in a way that assures teams continued existence in the league from year to year, which fosters an ongoing connection with the team's supporters
->fandom dependent on success
EU: The league does not choose which cities are to have teams in the top division. For example, Leeds, the fourth-biggest city in England, saw their team, Leeds United, relegated from the Premier League to the Championship in 2004, and then saw United relegated to the third-tier League One in 2007.
->fandom not dependent on success
NA: The franchises have territorial rights, usually exclusive territories large enough to cover major metropolitan areas, so that they have no local rivals.
->cartel spoon-feeding consumers
EU: As well as having no right to being in a certain tier, a club also has no territorial rights to its own area. A successful new team in a geographical location can come to dominate the incumbents.
->competition and passion
- - - Updated - - -
nice shot toyota