[ITA] Serie A 2011/2012 (90 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
How is Maggio limited?

He's been a consistently good player for several years and can do a decent job at RB, it's just that he's most suited to the role he plays at Napoli and the role he played at Samp.
 
OP
Dostoevsky

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,026
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #204
    How is Maggio limited?

    He's been a consistently good player for several years and can do a decent job at RB, it's just that he's most suited to the role he plays at Napoli and the role he played at Samp.
    I'd rather say this season only.

    And he's limited because IMO he's a brainless player like Drenthe but he does have more tactical awareness. I don't like when fullbacks aren't dynamic and can't get past opponents when needed, but they decide to play back with the ball. One of the few reasons why I liked Caceres is because of his aggression and dynamic style.

    Dunno, I don't rate Maggio, I think he's decent at best and I don't think I'd ever consider him for any bigger club.
     

    JuveJay

    Senior Signor
    Moderator
    Mar 6, 2007
    75,001
    You said Maggio was a typical defensive Italian right back before and seem to be intimating the same again, is there any particular reason for this?
     

    Red

    -------
    Moderator
    Nov 26, 2006
    47,024
    Dusan, I'm not going to say Maggio's great or anything; Napoli is a good fit for him.

    One thing I can't figure out about how you like a team to play:

    You like attacking fullbacks and you like attacking wingers.

    Do you like to play two DMs or are you quite happy to only have three defensive players on the pitch?

    What happens if you come up against a team who plays the same way? Do you try to defend with only a few players against a side that leaves three or four players high up the pitch?
     

    acmilan

    Plusvalenza Akbar
    Nov 8, 2005
    10,722
    But what's the difference between an offensive wingback or a defensive winger? :hustini:
    about 10 ... maybe 15 meters :D

    Menez could be a very good signing for the price mentioned but I am yet to find confirmation on the rumour ... he has indeed turned into a complete scumbag in Roma but, as a Milan fan ;), I am hoping it's just a reflection of the environment and locker room at the Olimpico. Other than that, he is a very talanted player I wanted instead of Gourcuff, while Menez was still at Monaco. If Menez can be influenced by Allegri and the Milan environment, he may well turn out to be a lot more than a depth signing for Milan.

    This being sad, at this point in time, he is hardly what the fans are expecting as his allure as a player is far behind that of Fabregas, Ganso, etc
     
    OP
    Dostoevsky

    Dostoevsky

    Tzu
    Administrator
    May 27, 2007
    89,026
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #208
    You said Maggio was a typical defensive Italian right back before and seem to be intimating the same again, is there any particular reason for this?
    You mean today? Because I said a wing back

    Defensive winger on the other hand is the biggest joke ever IMO and most useless player(s) that can be bough. Or wing backs like Maggio... :sick:
    Or way earlier maybe?

    Maybe I did say that. If I say so that probably means that if he plays as a RB he's useless and wingers will toy with him.
     
    OP
    Dostoevsky

    Dostoevsky

    Tzu
    Administrator
    May 27, 2007
    89,026
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #209
    Dusan, I'm not going to say Maggio's great or anything; Napoli is a good fit for him.

    One thing I can't figure out about how you like a team to play:

    You like attacking fullbacks and you like attacking wingers.

    Do you like to play two DMs or are you quite happy to only have three defensive players on the pitch?

    What happens if you come up against a team who plays the same way? Do you try to defend with only a few players against a side that leaves three or four players high up the pitch?
    There are too many formations I'd like to see, but they all require different approach. Sometimes I give a shit formation because it's quite realistic or something we can see at Juve next season. But if it was up to me, I'd play 4-3-3 with two wide wingers and a midfield like Inler - Pirlo - Marchisio (not that those are world class but something that I think it could work). If there's a random choice of players I'd probably pick Inler - Pirlo - Kwadwo with some wingers, striker would be Matri at this point, or if I had a pick - Benzema. As for defense I'd like to balance it but it surely wouldn't be all defensive. I'd like to get Beck (or Isla) for example as I think he's pretty balanced and adds a lot while left back would probably be more offensive. Of course, many other players are needed and if it was up to me Sissoko would be in the rotation.

    4-4-2 with defensive fullbacks, semi-attacking wingers, regista and a DM = Italians fail. On the top of that add a SS and a poacher. IMO that's one of the biggest flaws in Italy where many coaches still love that, but I find it extremely useless, especially in Europe.
     

    Red

    -------
    Moderator
    Nov 26, 2006
    47,024
    Just curious, since you seem to spend the entire time disagreeing whenever someone (me) suggests a more defensively capable player be favoured anywhere other than CB.

    I like 4-4-1-1, but when I speak about 'defensive' wingers, I mean guys like Nedved and Camoranesi who are great going forward, but still work hard.

    I pretty much agree with you on the 4-3-3 and the sort of players that should be in it for Juve next season, though.
     
    OP
    Dostoevsky

    Dostoevsky

    Tzu
    Administrator
    May 27, 2007
    89,026
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #211
    Just curious, since you seem to spend the entire time disagreeing whenever someone (me) suggests a more defensively capable player be favoured anywhere other than CB.

    I like 4-4-1-1, but when I speak about 'defensive' wingers, I mean guys like Nedved and Camoranesi who are great going forward, but still work hard.

    I pretty much agree with you on the 4-3-3 and the sort of players that should be in it for Juve next season, though.
    I guess I'm in favor of having a dynamic team when players do different things and can fit different roles. Wingers should run back, but I don't think they are required to play any defensive football whatsoever. I can mention Barcelona players, but I will be told how they play possession football, which is true. But there are some other clubs (Real) that play very offensive and yet do very well. They can field Di Maria, Ozil, Ronaldo, Xabi, Kaka or Benzema and they will do great (only different approach against crazy Barca). Yet some would say how their defense is amazing and how they defend great but they have Marcelo as their left back, somebody who's claimed to be awful in defense. To sum it up, I think defensive roles and their movement is vital for organization of the whole team, but midfield should have more freedom. DMs are becoming a past IMO, as box-to-box players are having more vital role nowadays I think, which is another good point how to focus central midfield. But when I see this:

    GK

    Defensive RB - CB - CB - Defensive LB

    Workrate RW - DM - Regista - Workrate LW

    SS - Poacher

    I feel like throwing up.
     

    JuveJay

    Senior Signor
    Moderator
    Mar 6, 2007
    75,001
    True, you only need one of each type on the flanks. Not that I think we'll set up that way. We didn't last season. We had offensive RW, workrate LW, and two attacking (crap) fullbacks.
     

    Red

    -------
    Moderator
    Nov 26, 2006
    47,024
    I guess I'm in favor of having a dynamic team when players do different things and can fit different roles. Wingers should run back, but I don't think they are required to play any defensive football whatsoever. I can mention Barcelona players, but I will be told how they play possession football, which is true. But there are some other clubs (Real) that play very offensive and yet do very well. They can field Di Maria, Ozil, Ronaldo, Xabi, Kaka or Benzema and they will do great (only different approach against crazy Barca). Yet some would say how their defense is amazing and how they defend great but they have Marcelo as their left back, somebody who's claimed to be awful in defense. To sum it up, I think defensive roles and their movement is vital for organization of the whole team, but midfield should have more freedom. DMs are becoming a past IMO, as box-to-box players are having more vital role nowadays I think, which is another good point how to focus central midfield. But when I see this:

    GK

    Defensive RB - CB - CB - Defensive LB

    Workrate RW - DM - Regista - Workrate LW

    SS - Poacher

    I feel like throwing up.
    No-one actually suggests playing with two defensive fullbacks and defensive wingers is a good idea, though.

    And do Real Madrid do very well with the system they play?

    They are miles better than everyone in Spain, except Barca, so it doesn't much matter what system they play in 90% of games.

    DMs have gone out of fashion a little in recent years because 4-3-3 was common, so there was no trequartista for the DM to play. With 4-2-3-1 being used by a lot of teams, I wouldn't be susrprised to see more teams going back to using a DM again.
     
    OP
    Dostoevsky

    Dostoevsky

    Tzu
    Administrator
    May 27, 2007
    89,026
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #216
    True, you only need one of each type on the flanks. Not that I think we'll set up that way. We didn't last season. We had offensive RW, workrate LW, and two attacking (crap) fullbacks.
    We had terribly organized defense, even if fullbacks were/are weak. As for our LB, he was anything but offensive, especially if we're talking about Grosso.

    Krasic was offensive but you can hear critics "ah, he's not defending" "his defensive game is weak". And hell, even Nedved told him to improve that IIRC, which I find rather silly. Pepe was doing... whatever he was doing, I didn't like it at all. But we're in favor of playing Del Piero - Matri lately, that SS - Poacher duo (due to injuries but still).

    I don't know... so far it seems just terrible. I don't like our transfer market so far and I'm not optimistic really. It seems to me that we're building one of those balanced 4-4-2 which will get overrun. Bastos - Melo - Pirlo/Marchisio - Krasic ... if we do miss out on Inler and Melo stays. To me that looks rather average, even if we have Matri - Quag up front. Ziegler - Chillini - Bonucci - X doesn't make me any more optimistic either. Hopefully we'll see a transfer explosion because our eyes will hurt from watching Juve next season if these rather average signings keep going.
     

    JuveJay

    Senior Signor
    Moderator
    Mar 6, 2007
    75,001
    Grosso, Traoré and De Ceglie are certainly offensive left backs, but not particularly good ones. For Grosso no pace or energy, for Traoré no finesse, for De Ceglie somewhere in between and no kneecap.
     

    Red

    -------
    Moderator
    Nov 26, 2006
    47,024
    Grosso has got up the line okay most of the games he's played.

    Clearly he doesn't do it with a great deal of pace, though.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 88)