Still, the guy took Liverpool to two CL finals in the last 6 years and that Liverpool was, imo, even weaker than Inter. At least it wasn't one of the favorites to win the CL.
That says that he too did a good job, either with motivating the players or, which is more probable, with reading and preparing the game.
Oh, definitely. I'm not saying Benitez isn't good at reading games, I just don't think he's anywhere close to Mourinho's level. It's true He got Liverpool to two C.l finals but here's what he failed to do. In both years where Liverpool went to the final, no one was convinced that Liverpool was the best team in Europe. In other words, he wasn't convincing. Granted, Liverpool did not by any means have the most impressive squad in Europe, but I would say that they were better than Mouri's Porto, don't you think.
Now even though Benitez has somewhat proven himself to be a good tactician; he hasn't come close to proving he's the best. Liverpool made it to the finals was thanks to their players playing above their respective levels. For me, a coach is a great tactician and a great reader of the game when he has the ability to absolutely shut down the opposing team. Benitez would make it to the final after conceding around 4 goals in total on aggregate. And then he would concede another two or three in the final.
For me, you have to be great defensively to be called a great tactician. That's what Benitez' liverpool lacked the last few years.