Perhaps. Don't know when it was and if it's still as you remember. AIPAC money is chump change compared to the money spent yearly by Qatar and others like China on American academia.
First just to clarify, I didn't mean there are no incidents where civilian casualties are taken into account and the army still proceed with an action, it is still a war and there is an acceptable collateral damage (what acceptable is another issue), I meant there are no incident where we attack civilians directly with the only aim to kill them. It just doesn't happen. For this you will never find evidence because there isn't and no one provided one yet. But you will find plenty of sources that claim or insinuate it happens. I have served for 5 years in total, not once did I hear even a suggestion that it's ok to shot an uninvolved person, it can happen as soldier are still humans, they can be an extremist with a easy finger on the trigger, or panic or make a bad judgment call, it is never a policy.
Secondly, this is not how the IDF operates, the government has no say whatsoever on operational matters, The PM can only authorize or not certain operations. They can't influence the army code of conduct or engagement directives. It's not how it works. The government is beholden to the settler part to stay in power but the army isn't, on the contrary, the Israeli army is traditionally left wing, and receives a lot of public criticism from the settler party for being leftist, dovish and not aggressive enough. The army is also accused for not letting officers with attachment to the settlement movements rise past a certain rank.
Also worth mentioning the Bibi himself doesn't let the settler movement MK's in the war cabinet as the army refuses to co-operate with them. Of course I'm not trying to convince anyone the above is true, just an example of how something that will scream bias to us wont necessarily for an outsider. Hence bias is sunjective.
Tick-tock is Chinese who are clearly anti-Israeli and I think its highly debatable twitter is not (still) a liberal/leftist/progressive dominated platform. Let's agree to disagree then.
They don't have borders because they didn't agree to any, that is exactly my point. By doing that they invertedly or not empowered the settler movement.
It's a false equivalency to oct. 7 because the Jewish terror groups were by and far a small, borderline fringe groups that were strongly opposed by vast majority of Jews and the Jewish leadership in the mandate. Hamas had over 70% of votes in the Gaza election and are still widely supported in Gaza and the west bank. That's why there is no elections in the west bank for over a decade, they will win.
First just to clarify, I didn't mean there are no incidents where civilian casualties are taken into account and the army still proceed with an action, it is still a war and there is an acceptable collateral damage (what acceptable is another issue), I meant there are no incident where we attack civilians directly with the only aim to kill them. It just doesn't happen. For this you will never find evidence because there isn't and no one provided one yet. But you will find plenty of sources that claim or insinuate it happens. I have served for 5 years in total, not once did I hear even a suggestion that it's ok to shot an uninvolved person, it can happen as soldier are still humans, they can be an extremist with a easy finger on the trigger, or panic or make a bad judgment call, it is never a policy.
Secondly, this is not how the IDF operates, the government has no say whatsoever on operational matters, The PM can only authorize or not certain operations. They can't influence the army code of conduct or engagement directives. It's not how it works. The government is beholden to the settler part to stay in power but the army isn't, on the contrary, the Israeli army is traditionally left wing, and receives a lot of public criticism from the settler party for being leftist, dovish and not aggressive enough. The army is also accused for not letting officers with attachment to the settlement movements rise past a certain rank.
Also worth mentioning the Bibi himself doesn't let the settler movement MK's in the war cabinet as the army refuses to co-operate with them. Of course I'm not trying to convince anyone the above is true, just an example of how something that will scream bias to us wont necessarily for an outsider. Hence bias is sunjective.
Tick-tock is Chinese who are clearly anti-Israeli and I think its highly debatable twitter is not (still) a liberal/leftist/progressive dominated platform. Let's agree to disagree then.
They don't have borders because they didn't agree to any, that is exactly my point. By doing that they invertedly or not empowered the settler movement.
It's a false equivalency to oct. 7 because the Jewish terror groups were by and far a small, borderline fringe groups that were strongly opposed by vast majority of Jews and the Jewish leadership in the mandate. Hamas had over 70% of votes in the Gaza election and are still widely supported in Gaza and the west bank. That's why there is no elections in the west bank for over a decade, they will win.
Buy on AliExpress.com
Last edited:
