Israeli-Palestinian conflict (14 Viewers)
- Thread starter ReBeL
- Start date
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_artifacts_in_biblical_archaeology
- - - Updated - - -
It does, hat's off.
I still would say surgical strike is hardly an equivalent to "annihilation" of a whole country in the quotes I provided, but I concede.
- - - Updated - - -
It does, hat's off.
I still would say surgical strike is hardly an equivalent to "annihilation" of a whole country in the quotes I provided, but I concede.
Who said 'annihilation' that you were quoting that? If you are talking about me -I just said 'bombing'. As I've explained in my previous post 'bombing' is in itself a humanitarian aid if its done by the zionist state. Its a humanitarian aid if the USoA is doing it too, but they've been wrong on occasion, unlike Israel. Also, let us not forget without poor or nationalist hammericans dying in the middle east, 'occupation' would be something experienced by the holy state of the chosen people.
BTW if Israel doesn't defeat a major nuclear power(albeit a defunct one - say France) just as a precaution, what's to stop say the chinese to get a new religion(Shekelism, for instance) and lay a claim on the holy landz? Two hundred years from now that will be the dream of at least 2.5 billion Chinese, effectively dooming the chosen people. I say do the french in an act of WW3 prevention, we'd all understand!
...And also the french went le soft on the Iranian sanctions. Cowards that they are - they also don't want to bomb Iran!
BTW if Israel doesn't defeat a major nuclear power(albeit a defunct one - say France) just as a precaution, what's to stop say the chinese to get a new religion(Shekelism, for instance) and lay a claim on the holy landz? Two hundred years from now that will be the dream of at least 2.5 billion Chinese, effectively dooming the chosen people. I say do the french in an act of WW3 prevention, we'd all understand!
...And also the french went le soft on the Iranian sanctions. Cowards that they are - they also don't want to bomb Iran!
You know, I tried to be polite and open-minded, but you are just rude or dump. Everyone can see who wrote what, its a forum ffs. What can one expect from a boy quoting buzzfeed and wiked.pedi.a... Perhaps facebook posts?
I am a friend of the Israeli movement for peace through strength, but you cowarded quickly... Nothing new here.
PS: Can go to any post, no one but YOU ever mentions 'annihilation'. Posts later and then you re-quoted yourself or 'In the quotes YOU provided'
How I am to take this - you won an argument with yourself or you lost one? After conceding to another poster that you don't know what your own government says! 
Anyway, I was being more conventional, pragmatical and peaceful and just said lets bomb Iran. I might not have added the 'strategic', 'military installations' parts, but they are not very truthful or 100% achievable anyways.
I am a friend of the Israeli movement for peace through strength, but you cowarded quickly... Nothing new here.
PS: Can go to any post, no one but YOU ever mentions 'annihilation'. Posts later and then you re-quoted yourself or 'In the quotes YOU provided'
How I am to take this - you won an argument with yourself or you lost one? After conceding to another poster that you don't know what your own government says! Anyway, I was being more conventional, pragmatical and peaceful and just said lets bomb Iran. I might not have added the 'strategic', 'military installations' parts, but they are not very truthful or 100% achievable anyways.
I agree but it's more about the intention then anything.
Although not (yet) active nuclear sites can be destroyed surgically without significant colletart damage. It's been done before, as long as it's not in a populated area which is almost never the case.
Again this are all empty talks, from both Iran and Israel.
Although not (yet) active nuclear sites can be destroyed surgically without significant colletart damage. It's been done before, as long as it's not in a populated area which is almost never the case.
Again this are all empty talks, from both Iran and Israel.
What do you think they are going to bomb? A 'passive' nuclear site? An old Iranian nuclear depot with rusty, but dangerous rockets?
Which part of the two stage process do you think Israel approves of? I think the part where Iran can have sticks and stones, before anything nuclear.
- - - Updated - - -
You serious?
' The biggest intelligence community of the world failed miserably.' - No, they didn't!!! They are so certain of the lack of oversight (plainly said fuck the hammerican voters and their powers) and their ability to do as they please that they didn't even bother to smuggle some after they captured Iraq.
They are quite professional and good at running world drug trade, a 2 trillion dollars/year operation by FBI conservative estimates. That puts any dot.com genius into a garage salesman in perspective.
Which part of the two stage process do you think Israel approves of? I think the part where Iran can have sticks and stones, before anything nuclear.
- - - Updated - - -
You serious?
' The biggest intelligence community of the world failed miserably.' - No, they didn't!!! They are so certain of the lack of oversight (plainly said fuck the hammerican voters and their powers) and their ability to do as they please that they didn't even bother to smuggle some after they captured Iraq.
They are quite professional and good at running world drug trade, a 2 trillion dollars/year operation by FBI conservative estimates. That puts any dot.com genius into a garage salesman in perspective.
Naturally, it's a risky business without assurance. It's not a decision anyone would take lightly. And they didn't fail imo, it was an intentional war.
- - - Updated - - -
Your are not making sense again. of course they will only bomb a nuclear site before it is active, that's the all point.
Regardless show me one other UN member state whose very existence is openly threatened by another UN member.
- - - Updated - - -
Your are not making sense again. of course they will only bomb a nuclear site before it is active, that's the all point.
Regardless show me one other UN member state whose very existence is openly threatened by another UN member.