++ [ originally posted by Adrian ] ++
lets not forget that if he leaves and we buy a young star like aimar or whoever, we will change our game plan once again and we wouldnt have to rely on the work ethics of a Pavel Nedved. we lossed creativity and gained hard work ethic when zidane left and nedved joined. its time we get back that creativity and really show great exciting football like we used to.
We didn't lose anything when Zidane left. We gained the ability to attack through more than one player. I think that no matter who we bought, that would not change, because we do have more options now.
++ [ originally posted by Hydde ] ++
Well,,, it seems that nedved and trezeguet are staying...so... from where we will get money to do the supposed signings?
If we need money,better to sell Iuliano, legrotaglie, Tachinardi and divaio.
If we sell the Czech, we would lose offensive power.What we need his a creative middfielder that switches Pavel in 3/4, like Carletto is doing with Kaka and Pirlo.
++ [ originally posted by Eaglesnake_1 ] ++
If we need money,better to sell Iuliano, legrotaglie, Tachinardi and divaio.
If we sell the Czech, we would lose offensive power.What we need his a creative middfielder that switches Pavel in 3/4, like Carletto is doing with Kaka and Pirlo.
I think its always good to have nedved ...IMO he is not the only one to blame for his bad performance the hall team did bad, and he couldnt have solved everything on his own
Why not just sell Nedved as a big blow to get a big amount of cash and buy a cuppa defenders and perhaps even one creative player that wont cost too much but good nontheless? If selling Nedved alone is not enough we could always just sell one of either Iuliano or Di Vaio or Camo or whoever of choice ...