Which are almost inevitable conditions in autocratic and corrupt regimes. I'll be more specific here, you could have an autocratic regime politically, but relatively free of corruption, and adopting a form of free market system(see Singapore, China, Malaysia) in those cases you probably would not have it that bad as its only political freedoms that citizens lack, but they're relatively free in everything else, their countries would probably boast a high standard of living, education, infrastructure and all that would probably be at a decent level.
But when you have the extremely autocratic regimes like the Libya's and Syria's of the world, where not only is there a lack of political freedom, but corruption is rampant, almost everything in society is centralized with the political elite. In those countries, there almost always is poor education, sub par infrastructure, unemployment, corruption, etc. Those are breeding grounds for extremists. Toppling the regime in those countries comes with disastrous results as we've seen in Libya, Iraq and Syria.
- - - Updated - - -
But dictatorship/no dictatorship are probably one of the main factors leading to the existence of those determinants you're referring to.
Buy on AliExpress.com
