Internationals LIVE (28 Viewers)

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
97,911
Mark, I agree with you about these brazilians and other clear mercenary stuff (Camoranesi included). Just saying one shouldnt group those with the others.

I mean the mercenary brazilians and others (though its like 90% brazilians anyway) even have the gaul to say publically that they prefer brazil and love brazil, that they would play for brazil any time and see themselves as brazilians (Amauri belongs to this group), but see this 2nd country as a "career" opportunity. They dont even have the decency to lie, Senna even said the above after the euro win with Spain, when he was on holiday in Brazil. How insulting.
True. Sometimes people generalize too much. About Camo, I think Argentina didn't give a f*ck about him, same with Amauri I guess so it's either Italy or watch the WC at home.

true but if I had to pick.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,113
He's behind Ricardo Oliveira apparently in Dunga's list.
Yeah, well Dunga's list suck. He doesn't even have Diego.


Amauri

Robinho - Diego - Kaka​

And fuck Kaka, he could play on the flank cuz Diego should play behind the striker.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,133
Well there is no purpose of NT football, if Aurelio's are going to be playing for Turkey, Sebastian Soria's playing for Qatar and Eduardo's playing for Croatia.
Some could say that there is no purpose of Arsenal representing England and bringing points to England in UEFA if they don't have at least 51% English players in the team, but unfortunately the rules allow them to do it, so they're perfectly entitled to field 11 foreigners.
Since the FIFA rules allow a passport holder to play for that country, then he surely can and should and i don't see why there is no purpose if a citizen of a certain country can't play for that country. Who cares how and why did he get the passport? Since he has the passport he's a citizen of that country just like all the others who hold a passport from that particular country.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,112
Some could say that there is no purpose of Arsenal representing England and bringing points to England in UEFA if they don't have at least 51% English players in the team, but unfortunately the rules allow them to do it, so they're perfectly entitled to field 11 foreigners.
Since the FIFA rules allow a passport holder to play for that country, then he surely can and should and i don't see why there is no purpose if a citizen of a certain country can't play for that country. Who cares how and why did he get the passport? Since he has the passport he's a citizen of that country just like all the others who hold a passport from that particular country.
NT's are there to represent countries. Club's aren't.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,802
I've held the same opinions for a long time. Everyone here knows I'm quite critical of our policies.

But this has nothing to do with Rossi and his traitor ideals.
Just saw an ample opportunity to supply a priceless comedic *truthiness :D



*Copy righted by Stephen Collbert, come at dawn to his lawn if you want to duel over the copy right.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
117,099
It's funny how people here criticize me for my opinions on Rossi, yet when it comes to stuff that really matters, as in human life, I say no to the Iraq wars, Afghani wars, and aggression with regard to foreign policy. I reject these faux wars without one doubt.

Yet I can't say that Rossi is a traitor? Wow. Don't think people here understand the true meaning of patriotism, but that's not surprising.

And no, patriotism is not blowing up foreign countries because the government says so.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 20)