@ Rab Take That is getting back together. Your dreams will come true 
Buy on AliExpress.com
If there was one band you could have saved... (5 Viewers)
- Thread starter V
- Start date
Yeah, though it looks diff now. You heard their last song?
Buy on AliExpress.com
Yeah its not the same. Maybe Robbie Williams will come back one of these days and the old Take That will be back int:
I couldn't help myself. At least I didn't mention the New Kids on the Block reunion.
int:
I noticed that.
And just because I said you were cute doesn't give you the right to ruin my thread with talk about Take That. I know Rab started it but don't encourage him.
And just because I said you were cute doesn't give you the right to ruin my thread with talk about Take That. I know Rab started it but don't encourage him.
I couldn't help myself. At least I didn't mention the New Kids on the Block reunion.
My friend! My dear friend!! you are underestimating me here, I have loads of important connections.
shud uuuuuuuuuuuuuup!
shuuuuuud uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuup.
Seriously, I love them all together, but you are keep telling me that wrong thing! David Gilmour wasn't one of the founders of the Pink Floyd, they were 4, Syd, Roger, Richard and Nick! NO DAVID! Sure the band "David Gilmour and friends" did ok job, and had some great songs, but not as genius as they did before with Rogers, and I don't deny the fact that Gilmour didn't have his impact with his guitar, and I love his voice too, and like Salman said it, Gilmour didn't like the idea that he was one step behind of Waters, and Waters is an asshole and I don't deny that neither, but the son of a bitch was talented like Ibrahimovic (Rab won't like this) just admit it, his absence was obvious, the beauty was all gone..
You still should get that Waters concert I told you, or have that Amuse to death Album, ofcourse it was the same way, not as great as when Gilmour with him and vice versa..
shud uuuuuuuuuuuuuup!
Oh glad we got that resolved. I haven't listen to a single minute of any leaked Guns material, it's sort of a protest against Axl. But if the album sees the light of day, I'll probably give it a shot.
Hmm...it's strange that you would say Page is your all time favourite guitarist, mine too when I take in consideration everything, and I know you like Clapton as well. So not liking Hendrix doesn't fit the "profile". You should listen to some Hendrix, I wasn't a fan not too long ago either, but man, could he play. You need to experience it, there's no other way you can understand his impact on rock music and how much it lost when he died. Freddie's death simply didn't have such an impact because everyone knew him, knew what he did and what he could do. Hendrix died practically as soon as he hit his peak, I can only imagine what he would have recorded had he lived a few more years. And Mercury'd death got a lot more medie exposure because it was the 90's and he was gay and he died of AIDS, etc. Scandals, scandals, scandals whereas Hendrix died at the start of the 70's where his death was known only among rock musicians and fans.
Let me put it this way; Freddie had little or nothing left to show to RNR, he already done it all, Hendrix had a ton of things in front of him, a genius which we were stripped off too soon. Rock simply lost more with Hendrix then it did with Freddie.
I wasn't questioning Waters' creative influence, he's a genius, no doubt about it but it's his own decision and his musical direction he wanted to take that got him out of Floyd. That's what frustrates me with Waters fans, they think he was the core of the band when he simply wasn't. I don't know if you're much of a Maiden fan, but Steve Harris is (coincendantallly) the bassist and main songwriter(wrote probably 90% of the songs) of the band whereas everyone knows the band is not half as good without the gentleman in my avatar. It's the same with Waters and Gilmour, neither was more important, songwriting is no less important than singing those songs or playing some of the most amazing guitar solos on them. And in the end Gilmour, with the rest of the band, recorded some great stuff without Waters so..just don't call it fake Pink Floyd and that will be enough.
Hmm...it's strange that you would say Page is your all time favourite guitarist, mine too when I take in consideration everything, and I know you like Clapton as well. So not liking Hendrix doesn't fit the "profile". You should listen to some Hendrix, I wasn't a fan not too long ago either, but man, could he play. You need to experience it, there's no other way you can understand his impact on rock music and how much it lost when he died. Freddie's death simply didn't have such an impact because everyone knew him, knew what he did and what he could do. Hendrix died practically as soon as he hit his peak, I can only imagine what he would have recorded had he lived a few more years. And Mercury'd death got a lot more medie exposure because it was the 90's and he was gay and he died of AIDS, etc. Scandals, scandals, scandals whereas Hendrix died at the start of the 70's where his death was known only among rock musicians and fans.
Let me put it this way; Freddie had little or nothing left to show to RNR, he already done it all, Hendrix had a ton of things in front of him, a genius which we were stripped off too soon. Rock simply lost more with Hendrix then it did with Freddie.
I wasn't questioning Waters' creative influence, he's a genius, no doubt about it but it's his own decision and his musical direction he wanted to take that got him out of Floyd. That's what frustrates me with Waters fans, they think he was the core of the band when he simply wasn't. I don't know if you're much of a Maiden fan, but Steve Harris is (coincendantallly) the bassist and main songwriter(wrote probably 90% of the songs) of the band whereas everyone knows the band is not half as good without the gentleman in my avatar. It's the same with Waters and Gilmour, neither was more important, songwriting is no less important than singing those songs or playing some of the most amazing guitar solos on them. And in the end Gilmour, with the rest of the band, recorded some great stuff without Waters so..just don't call it fake Pink Floyd and that will be enough.
Seriously, I love them all together, but you are keep telling me that wrong thing! David Gilmour wasn't one of the founders of the Pink Floyd, they were 4, Syd, Roger, Richard and Nick! NO DAVID! Sure the band "David Gilmour and friends" did ok job, and had some great songs, but not as genius as they did before with Rogers, and I don't deny the fact that Gilmour didn't have his impact with his guitar, and I love his voice too, and like Salman said it, Gilmour didn't like the idea that he was one step behind of Waters, and Waters is an asshole and I don't deny that neither, but the son of a bitch was talented like Ibrahimovic (Rab won't like this
) just admit it, his absence was obvious, the beauty was all gone.. You still should get that Waters concert I told you, or have that Amuse to death Album, ofcourse it was the same way, not as great as when Gilmour with him and vice versa..
lol there is angerls and airwaves from one of them and a group called +44 from the other 2 in it,catchy pop-punk all round people
freddie mercury trule was the greatest frontman to ever lift a mic
i do love pink floyd, i do have the live dvd but for me their greatests album was dark side of the moon and its very hard to top such genius
seriusly?the smiths were a great band, up tehre with the joy division in the influence that they ahd but morrisey has had an incredibly successful career
for me there were many great bands mentioned here and i agree witha lot of opinions, for me the best band that split up too early were the stone roses. the early 90's madchester movement produces a lot of excelelnt bands but none came close to the genius of the roses, ian brown and john squires fell apart spectacularly, squires went on a coke-fuelled binge and came out with the successful(but short-lived) seahorses, the smart money was on squires to make it bigger as he was widely believed to be the 'genius' behind the roses and everybody qrote off ian brown
big mistake,ian brown has gone on to become one of the most influential singers in british music, a total genius, when you look at the swagger of oasis, the style of arctic monkeys and the electronic infusement of kasabian you know theya re all paying homage to a true british legend
freddie mercury trule was the greatest frontman to ever lift a mic
i do love pink floyd, i do have the live dvd but for me their greatests album was dark side of the moon and its very hard to top such genius
seriusly?the smiths were a great band, up tehre with the joy division in the influence that they ahd but morrisey has had an incredibly successful career
for me there were many great bands mentioned here and i agree witha lot of opinions, for me the best band that split up too early were the stone roses. the early 90's madchester movement produces a lot of excelelnt bands but none came close to the genius of the roses, ian brown and john squires fell apart spectacularly, squires went on a coke-fuelled binge and came out with the successful(but short-lived) seahorses, the smart money was on squires to make it bigger as he was widely believed to be the 'genius' behind the roses and everybody qrote off ian brown
big mistake,ian brown has gone on to become one of the most influential singers in british music, a total genius, when you look at the swagger of oasis, the style of arctic monkeys and the electronic infusement of kasabian you know theya re all paying homage to a true british legend
