Honshu, Japan Earthquake & Tsunami - March 2011 (15 Viewers)

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,795
Yep, no biggie at all. Worse than Three Mile but no biggie.
Not one person has died. A few thousand have evacuated.

Contrast with thousands of dead bodies and billions of dollars of damage to hundreds of decimated towns and cities. There's no comparison. But then look at this thread. 80%+ of the posts are about nuclear fears.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Dragon

Senior Member
Apr 24, 2003
27,407
Not one person has died. A few thousand have evacuated.

Contrast with thousands of dead bodies and billions of dollars of damage to hundreds of decimated towns and cities. There's no comparison. But then look at this thread. 80%+ of the posts are about nuclear fears.
And nothing serious has happened yet...
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,251
Not one person has died. A few thousand have evacuated.

Contrast with thousands of dead bodies and billions of dollars of damage to hundreds of decimated towns and cities. There's no comparison. But then look at this thread. 80%+ of the posts are about nuclear fears.
Well what do you expect? The reactor issues are currently underway and the situation is deteriorating. If another Tsunami or massive Earthquake hit, those issues would take the forefront again, as that's the whole concept of "breaking news."

Anything else, I don't know what to say. Don't visit the thread if you don't like my updates.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,251
Andy,

How do you know what earthquakes are going to cause Tsunamis? Is it all about the location?
It's largely about depth and location of the quakes. Watches are usually issued in that case. Warnings are usually issued if you have a shallow quake and/or have real time data indicating a Tsunami has been created, data which would come from buoys, imaging or eye witness reports.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,251
I thought this was incredible. An event that happens every 1,000 years is rather difficult to prepare for, if you ask me.

Tsunamis on the scale that hit north-east Japan last week may strike the region about once every 1,000 years, a leading seismologist has said.

Dr Roger Musson said there were similarities between the last week's event and another giant wave that hit the Sendai coast in 869AD.

It is not unusual for undersea earthquakes to generate tsunamis in this part of Japan. Offshore quakes in the 19th and 20th centuries also caused large walls of water to hit this area of coastline.

But previous research by a Japanese team shows that in the 869 "Jogan" disaster, tsunami waters moved some 4km inland, causing widespread flooding.

The researchers said that such gigantic tsunamis occur in the area roughly once every 1,000 years. Dr Musson, who is the head of seismic hazard at the British Geological Survey (BGS), suggested the latest tsunami was comparable to the event in 869.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12740649
 
Apr 15, 2006
56,640
Still, I have to say ... as much as I don't like nuclear meltdowns, it's a paltry excuse for a news story compared to the massive death and destruction wrought by the original earthquake and tsunami. Methinks the media has turned a feeding frenzy out of this because, in part, they've run out of anything new to say about the earthquake and tsunami. It's certainly a big international story, but it's been exacerbated by people hungry for new news where there isn't much of any.
Well you're a cynical lil' fucker, aren't ya! :eyebrows:
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,795
Well what do you expect? The reactor issues are currently underway and the situation is deteriorating. If another Tsunami or massive Earthquake hit, those issues would take the forefront again, as that's the whole concept of "breaking news."
But that's news. They report on "what could have been" more often than they report on "what is". That's called making stuff up. And the thing is, there's a demand for it. And the vacuum needs to be filled. It's the same mechanism that fuels media frenzy on things like OJ Simpson for example.

Though I had to laugh at the fact that I used "evacuate" in a form they made fun of on The Wire...

I thought this was incredible. An event that happens every 1,000 years is rather difficult to prepare for, if you ask me.
But Burke says nobody should be surprised. ;)

Well you're a cynical lil' fucker, aren't ya! :eyebrows:
Damn right I am. I know when I am being manipulated for ratings and profit. :p
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,795
The news is that the nuclear crisis in Japan must be really bad.

How do I know this?

It's not the news reports, it's not the people evacuating Tokyo, it's not the stock markets.

It's me starting to receive spam mail with the subject line, "swag - If your nuclear cooling system breaks it could cost you $2,550" :sergio:
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,541
The news is that the nuclear crisis in Japan must be really bad.

How do I know this?

It's not the news reports, it's not the people evacuating Tokyo, it's not the stock markets.

It's me starting to receive spam mail with the subject line, "swag - If your nuclear cooling system breaks it could cost you $2,550" :sergio:
Rofl, so creative.

Looks apocalyptic.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 14)