Goran Pandev (2 Viewers)

Who is a better football player?

  • Pandev

  • Quagliarella


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,332
I'd love it though. Three weird, weird strikers.

But I want Lavezzi at Napoli. He's their new symbol. I want to play against great clubs, I want the big Napoli back.
 

pitbull

Senior Member
Jul 26, 2007
11,045
What if I put it this way:

Pandev > Iaquinta
:p
Screw Pandev, Iaquinta all the way. I don't watch Lazio week in, week out, but i can't see what's so special about him or Lazio team as a whole (we are linked to Kolarov also i guess), they both are.. uninteresting. I don't think that Pandev is something special, he's about as special as Lucarelli in Livorno, Bianchi in Reggina or Rocchi few years back in Lazio were, nice goalscorers, but Vinny has proved himself in Azurri and Juventus as well as in Udinese.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,941
Screw Pandev, Iaquinta all the way. I don't watch Lazio week in, week out, but i can't see what's so special about him or Lazio team as a whole (we are linked to Kolarov also i guess), they both are.. uninteresting. I don't think that Pandev is something special, he's about as special as Lucarelli in Livorno, Bianchi in Reggina or Rocchi few years back in Lazio were, nice goalscorers, but Vinny has proved himself in Azurri and Juventus as well as in Udinese.
Nah, no place for Pandev in Juve, i agree with that, but it's a crime to compare him with Bianchi.
Pandev is very talented and technically one of the best in the league. In these last years he terrorized the best defenses he played against (not just that episode with our defense). But he's lazy and that's the most negative thing about him. He's also inconsistent.

He's not great to replace Del Piero and he's not a hard worker to replace Iaquinta. But he's a very good player, that's for sure.
 

pitbull

Senior Member
Jul 26, 2007
11,045
Nah, no place for Pandev in Juve, i agree with that, but it's a crime to compare him with Bianchi.
Pandev is very talented and technically one of the best in the league. In these last years he terrorized the best defenses he played against (not just that episode with our defense). But he's lazy and that's the most negative thing about him. He's also inconsistent.

He's not great to replace Del Piero and he's not a hard worker to replace Iaquinta. But he's a very good player, that's for sure.
Well Quagliarella too is inconsistent, provides magic at times and for many games this season he has been the main force of Udinese upfron, while he tends to dissapear from game. Fabio's technique ain't bad, he can shoot from everywhere with good results, so what's the big difference between them? Pandev's got more flash on him so he is the superior player (with lots of >>>)? The result is kinda the same, and i don't think that the players like Berbatov and Pandev got more potential than the players like Quagliarella or Rooney, lazyness is just as hard to fix as lacking in technical or physical ability.
 

Oggy

and the Cockroaches
Dec 27, 2005
7,512
Actually, those who watched Darko Pancev in the past will say that Macedonians can play football.
Even though I was little boy when he play for Zvezda I remember him very well, he always was the guy who scored :)

I was cheering for Zvezda back then (I was too young and fan boy :D)


P.S. @Alen: just imagine what NT we would have if we stayed as Yugoslavia :)
 

Oggy

and the Cockroaches
Dec 27, 2005
7,512
Then or now?

Now it wasn't going to be too strong (unless Zlatan played for us, which he would have done if we were Yugoslavia :p ).
Then and now :D

If we count all the players that are playing now we could make great team at least on par with Italy I think. Also our mentality could do wonders, but also could destroy us.

But hey we (Yugoslavia) were called Brazil from Europe :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)