Good news about Juve thread (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
Stagliano (Figc): "Juve compromessa, per il Milan al momento non c'è nulla"
22 05 2006
"Secondo il viceprocuratore dimissionario della Federcalcio Stagliano, il Milan uscirebbe fin qui sostanzialmente pulito dalla vicenda. Parlando anche da esperto di diritto, Stagliano afferma infatti che se "la Juve appare compromessa, per quanto riguarda i rossoneri al momento non c'è niente".
any translation , i read in another forum that if there is no new evidence , Juve will be cleared of all charges due to lack of enough evidence as i predicted
22 05 2006
"Secondo il viceprocuratore dimissionario della Federcalcio Stagliano, il Milan uscirebbe fin qui sostanzialmente pulito dalla vicenda. Parlando anche da esperto di diritto, Stagliano afferma infatti che se "la Juve appare compromessa, per quanto riguarda i rossoneri al momento non c'è niente".
any translation , i read in another forum that if there is no new evidence , Juve will be cleared of all charges due to lack of enough evidence as i predicted
Iam still puzzled about this news. Here's the translation from FreeTranslation.com:
Juve compromised, for the Milan to the moment there is not nothing" 22 05 2006 "according to the outgoing viceprocuratore of the Federcalcio Cut out, the Milan would go out outcome here substantially cleaned from the event. Speaking also from expert of law, they Cut out it affirms in fact that if "the Juve appears compromised, for how much pertains the rossoneri to the moment there is not nothing
Could anyone give an exact tranlation.. Thanks.
Juve compromised, for the Milan to the moment there is not nothing" 22 05 2006 "according to the outgoing viceprocuratore of the Federcalcio Cut out, the Milan would go out outcome here substantially cleaned from the event. Speaking also from expert of law, they Cut out it affirms in fact that if "the Juve appears compromised, for how much pertains the rossoneri to the moment there is not nothing
Could anyone give an exact tranlation.. Thanks.
the headline of that article says "Juve jeopardized, for Milan, there is nothing at present." The article does not say juve is innocent. The article merely states that juve is in jeopardy and currently there is nothing compromising Milan.
The english interpretation would be that the facts thus far appear to jeopardize juventus. That Milan look up until now to be substantially clean as there is nothing at this time that would place them in any kind of jeopardy.
The english interpretation would be that the facts thus far appear to jeopardize juventus. That Milan look up until now to be substantially clean as there is nothing at this time that would place them in any kind of jeopardy.
For this one and all the others, thanks 
Yeah, he says that "Juve appears jeopardized, but there is nothing at the moment about milan". Which is strange, because it's the same Stagliano that yesterday said there were no illicts talking. I guess it depends on what he means for "jeopardized". Of course, as he stated, he has read only the Torino documentation.
[Is it possible that in his more than 400 phone calls per day, Moggi never had an interesting chat with his best friend and ally Galliani?]
Yeah, he says that "Juve appears jeopardized, but there is nothing at the moment about milan". Which is strange, because it's the same Stagliano that yesterday said there were no illicts talking. I guess it depends on what he means for "jeopardized". Of course, as he stated, he has read only the Torino documentation.
[Is it possible that in his more than 400 phone calls per day, Moggi never had an interesting chat with his best friend and ally Galliani?]
isha00 said:
For this one and all the others, thanks
Yeah, he says that "Juve appears jeopardized, but there is nothing at the moment about milan". Which is strange, because it's the same Stagliano that yesterday said there were no illicts talking. I guess it depends on what he means for "jeopardized". Of course, as he stated, he has read only the Torino documentation.
[Is it possible that in his more than 400 phone calls per day, Moggi never had an interesting chat with his best friend and ally Galliani?]
Yeah, he says that "Juve appears jeopardized, but there is nothing at the moment about milan". Which is strange, because it's the same Stagliano that yesterday said there were no illicts talking. I guess it depends on what he means for "jeopardized". Of course, as he stated, he has read only the Torino documentation.
[Is it possible that in his more than 400 phone calls per day, Moggi never had an interesting chat with his best friend and ally Galliani?]
