++ [ originally posted by IncuboRossonero ] ++
Rickenbacker..Chill...
Do not insult me, then tell me to chill. You are either provoking me, or not, decide now.
++ [ originally posted by IncuboRossonero ] ++
as always your one step behind...
I apologize, but I've got other things going on in my life besides dealing with you.
++ [ originally posted by IncuboRossonero ] ++
I don't want to repeat myself and if you don't get it...well dude you just "don't get it". The prozac joke is too complicated I see so I'll try to make it simple next time: noted!
It's one thing to make a joke, it's another to base a serious argument on it. That's what you did, you based a serious argument on your assertion that Nedved takes prozac or acts as if he does. Don't think that I am a fool. You are doing the same thing which you took a shot at me for previously. You're just trying to make me seem like a fool for not getting your "joke." Very impressive, but your subtlety is not lost on me.
++ [ originally posted by IncuboRossonero ] ++
Nedved was far from great considering the performance of Buffon. I ask you? Would have have re-played that final without Buffon but with Nedved?? You would have lost faster than you can say "PIPPO HEADER"!
The fact is, you can not possible know what would have happened without Buffon, but we all know what happened without Nedved. I'm going to use some logic here, so you might get lost, but try anyway: If we know that Nedved's absence has a huge impact on the team, but we can only conjecture that Buffon's absence has the same effect, then Plato will tell you that the argument for Nedved is the stronger. It's a concept called the "Line of Cogency" Go look it up and you might figure it out.
++ [ originally posted by IncuboRossonero ] ++
Your honor..the defense rests.
I think I can translate that, I used to speak milanish: "I am now running away." Yeah, that's about right.