Global Warming Discussion (2 Viewers)

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
111,511
theres no denying the increase in temps, evidence is clear unless you all demagogue about it, the argument is around whats really causing the change.
It doesn't help when you extrapolate data in a certain direction just because you want to push an agenda.

Shutting down the global economy just because of a theory is completely asinine, too.

But hey, I'm sure the Goretards use very sophisticated earth-friendly jet fuel.
 
OP

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,350
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #235
    Goretards :lol:

    Nothing he owns is eco-friendly. Robust SUV's, private jets, mansions...such a hypocrite he is :lol:

    - - - Updated - - -

    http://mashable.com/2015/02/11/spacex-al-gore-favorite-satellite/

    Interesting. Al Gore sends a satellite into space to measure "the ebbs and flows of magnetic solar energy [that] could have a more serious impact on the planet than anything else in our lifetime. "

    It's sent to measure something we can't control that will have more of an impact on our planet than anything in our lifetime.

    LoL
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    111,511
    Goretards :lol:

    Nothing he owns is eco-friendly. Robust SUV's, private jets, mansions...such a hypocrite he is :lol:

    - - - Updated - - -

    http://mashable.com/2015/02/11/spacex-al-gore-favorite-satellite/

    Interesting. Al Gore sends a satellite into space to measure "the ebbs and flows of magnetic solar energy [that] could have a more serious impact on the planet than anything else in our lifetime. "

    It's sent to measure something we can't control that will have more of an impact on our planet than anything in our lifetime.

    LoL
    At least Gore is finally on the right track. The sun naturally rules all within our solar system. If it blows up one day, we all die. So at the end of the day, global warming or no global warming, it doesn't really matter.


    Blood And Gore: Making A Killing On Anti-Carbon Investment Hype

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybe...ing-a-killing-on-anti-carbon-investment-hype/
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    111,511
    A study recently published linking carbon dioxide emissions due to human activity to an increase in the greenhouse effect on Earth's surface:

    www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature14240.html
    So in order to dumb this down to the masses, this study took a time series of CO2 emissions from two geographic locations and compared them to average atmospheric radiance transmissions for a whole ten years. Only ten years of data out of millions, but hey, let's conclude that humans are truly almighty. Notice how there is no other hypothesis other than "we did it", no other possible explanation, including actual science as it pertains to the carbon life cycle.

    Clearly, the scientific method is not being followed here. They begin with one hypothesis and gear it towards that narrative. Please show me the data that significantly demonstrates 1) humans are the only cause of GW and 2) humans cause x number of hurricanes or tornados or droughts or mudslides. Good luck.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)