Yeah watch him sell lautaro this summer, you nerds never learn this guy never had a strategy except jumping on market opportunities and praying to God the coach somehow makes it work, but go ahead and keep your nostalgia goggles on.
That's not even my point, if we are trying to progress as a team we can improve one area at the expense of another, I don't mind selling anyone if we have a solid strategy in place
Giroud is gonna be back up. Currently they don't have another striker with the physical presence of Lukaku, hence why the need a backup. Don't tell me Giroud isn't good enough as back up striker for Inter.
I think i too laughed at the transfer but didn't really bother, as i was sure he wasn't gonna play much.
Don't quite get the Giroud comparison tbh. He is in good shape, fit's Conte and the 352, and they don't have a back up for Lukaku. A transfer that makes perfect sense for them.
Let's not pretend that Marotta didn't do well at Juventus...he did. However his selling policy was flawed imo, and its partly the reason why our midfield has suffered. Also, people tend to forget that his first season was terrible (2011). It took until his second season (2012) to sign the likes of Vidal and Pirlo and the one after with Tevez and pogba. Still weird seeing him and Conte at Inter.
Yeah watch him sell lautaro this summer, you nerds never learn this guy never had a strategy except jumping on market opportunities and praying to God the coach somehow makes it work, but go ahead and keep your nostalgia goggles on.
A lot of that made sense though at the time considering the squad was significantly weaker and we had less money. adding quality wherever you could improved the team in most areas and market opportunities where the best way to afford to do.
what doesnt make sense is the club continuing on that policy when it is no longer necessary/ sensible and claim they are targetting nothing short of CL victory
A lot of that made sense though at the time considering the squad was significantly weaker and we had less money. adding quality wherever you could improved the team in most areas and market opportunities where the best way to afford to do.
what doesnt make sense is the club continuing on that policy when it is no longer necessary/ sensible and claim they are targetting nothing short of CL victory
De ligt and ronaldo are market opportunities? Top 3 spenders, i think for midfield we just had no proven player available, by available i mean player wanting to join and or club willing to sell for close to market value.
De ligt and ronaldo are market opportunities? Top 3 spenders, i think for midfield we just had no proven player available, by available i mean player wanting to join and or club willing to sell for close to market value.
seems like we needed cash this year hence the Spinazzola deal and Dybala, Higuain rumours. FFP would be on our ass.
but depends who and how much he'd cost.
De ligt and ronaldo are market opportunities? Top 3 spenders, i think for midfield we just had no proven player available, by available i mean player wanting to join and or club willing to sell for close to market value.
not necessarily but what formation/ style is this squad built for exactly? It still looks to me very much like some pretty random pieces that the coach is just expected to put together even if they are much better pieces but like i said thats because the club has the money for it now. by market opportunities i did not mean they have to be cheap but are signed because they appear to be a good opportunity ala talent per dollar/ raiola player etc rather than creating a cohesive identity with depth in key positions so we arent playing a 433 one injury away from having to scrap the whole thing. maybe you see the current squad differently.
not necessarily but what formation/ style is this squad built for exactly? It still looks to me very much like some pretty random pieces that the coach is just expected to put together even if they are much better pieces but like i said thats because the club has the money for it now. by market opportunities i did not mean they have to be cheap but are signed because they appear to be a good opportunity ala talent per dollar/ raiola player etc rather than creating a cohesive identity with depth in key positions so we arent playing a 433 one injury away from having to scrap the whole thing. maybe you see the current squad differently.
I think our strategy is to go for playmakers which is very different from market opportunities, also it's silly to expect cohesiveness on the first season of a coach joining in with a new philosophy, if we believe in sarri then i really see us going for a player he will specifically ask for this summer and with some luck you will see a much more in tune team.