Giuseppe Marotta (67 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
- Tags asmr is so cool a_legend butthurt_tuz curtains dai is a feminist rus bangs hookers was holding us back
Because we still have 3 other strikers, 3 that won't bring us much cash probably, maybe even nothing if they don't want to go.
And, as others also said, I think I have read several times in interviews that he doesn't want to play for us either.
And the money we got for the co-ownership itself, how much was that?
Great deal, we can now splash them on well needed players.
- - - Updated - - -
That logic. We have to pay for our own players to come back
- - - Updated - - -
That logic. We have to pay for our own players to come back
That doesn't really make sense. Instead of selling a player, or loaning a player into oblivion you sell half the player and the onus of the buying team is to improve the player, but this has been gone over enough times now.
We use them to generate money (which we use to buy players for our first team) and give us stakes in other players (often in exchange). If it costs us more to bring a player back than we sold them for then that is because the player is doing well, we make more money from these deals than we lose.
We use them to generate money (which we use to buy players for our first team) and give us stakes in other players (often in exchange). If it costs us more to bring a player back than we sold them for then that is because the player is doing well, we make more money from these deals than we lose.
I would think that abolishing the co-ownership system would necessitate a reserve league of some kind. I don't think we would send so many players out on loan or co-own if they could still play games every week after graduating from the primavera. In any case UEFA trying to normalise things across Europe probably includes a reserve league for top leagues.
