Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Sanchez
Nani
Lulic

Voila, no need to be PSG.
Sanchez is to expensive for us and Lulic wouldnt be a starter but backup to asamoah. Nani depends on the formation.

Why next summer?
Cause we got significantly less income then expected cause we crashed out early in the CL

Adidas deal
New shirt sponorship deal
New Cl deal with mediaset which is higher than the previous deal.
Also i think even the domestic tv rights deal is set for a renewal.
All this kicks in 2015=better budget for transfers.
Adidas deal changes allmost nothing. Like the nike deal, its split in annual payments. And considering the small increase, per year it does allmost nothing.
Shirt sponsership, could be good, but it could also be another brand owned by exor/fiat, on a simular fee.
New cl deal is a good increase yes
domestic tv rights.. iirc there were figures of it a while ago, and it was a very nice increase. but take in account, its again annual payments.
By far the biggest factor would be getting in the quarter or semi finals of CL.
If that happens then we could really dish out in the transfer market.


Doesn't mean we can't make good moves this summer.
Sanchez
Nani
Lulic
Menez
Pereyra
Immobile

Very possible.

Forget sanchez. Likely, forget immobile if we spend on a winger. It'll be eighter pereyra or Lulic
more like Sanchez, Cuadrado, Coentrao, Eriksen, Lulic :donedeal::donedeal::donedeal::donedeal::donedeal::donedeal::donedeal::donedeal::donedeal:
We can have none of those bar Lulic

FFP

Marotta's way of saying we no money
:agree:

He also said it "there will not be significant spending" in his interview, or something along those lines

Juventino[RUS];4534278 said:
And from the top leagues Italian team will be banned first from eu tournaments because of breaking Ffp
Excellent point made. Pretty sure the corrupt sacks of shit, backed by the EPL would go after serie a first
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

j0ker

Capo di tutti capi
Jan 5, 2006
22,892
What if we sign Sanchez?

What excuse will you come up with?

And by the things are going we will probaly sell Immobile and bring back Giabiadini.
 

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
34,978
Its been a while ago but iirc that was closer to 10 mil extra then 20mil.

regardless, people read its over 100million and think thats in one season. I'm mostly pointing out its in annual payments.
Our Nike deal was at 13m per year.With Adidas we'll fetch almost 30m,so thats close to a 20m increase.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
What if we sign Sanchez?

What excuse will you come up with?

And by the things are going we will probaly sell Immobile and bring back Giabiadini.
I'm trying to keep people realistic, amids all those newspapers who spew bullshit on a daily basis.


Sanchez and Neymar are the only wingers that offer a direct goalscoring treath. All the others are just fake midfielders or pacy crossers, but barcelona doesnt do crosses, cause good luck crossing to a 5feet player.

And the biggest problem Barcelona is facing, is that teams go roflmao double holding midfielders on messi+ anticipating fullback, and do what the fuck you want on the flanks, they wont cross anyway.
If you have actual goalscoring treaths on the flanks, it creates room for them to exploit.
Then, there is Sanchez himself, who said more then once that he wished to remain at barcelona.

So the only way to get Sanchez, is to offer Barcelona more then what they got for him, so they could re-invest it in some other player they consider better for their formation.

However, we dont have that much cash.


We could sell immobile, a very stupid idea, but then we'd still be unable to afford him.

Unless something happens and he is forced out or barcelona is forced to sell, sanchez will remain there
 

AOD4

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2004
3,861
Thank You Marotta for building a great team. Congrats on the third scudetto.
Looking forward to your great acquisitions in the summer.
Classy Guy.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Our Nike deal was at 13m per year.With Adidas we'll fetch almost 30m,so thats close to a 20m increase.
Thats about 15 mil. If you want to call that "close to 20" then go ahead i guess.


Its a nice increase sure. But the majority here tought we'd get the entire sum at once. Its important to know its again the annual payments.
 

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
34,978
Yeah, tought so. Thats about 15 mil. If you want to call that "close to 20" then go ahead i guess.


Its a nice increase sure. But the majority here tought we'd get the entire sum at once. Its important to know its again the annual payments.
You said the Adidas deal is close to a 10m increase rather than 20m.(Excluding royalty bonuses).You can figure out whether 17 is closer to 10 or to 20..

I guess....
 

Vlad

In Allegri We Trust
May 23, 2011
24,041
You two :lol:

- - - Updated - - -

This 13mil deal with Nike, did that 13mil include licencing and merchandising activities ?

Cause sponsership alone, its 23.25mil/annum.
I wouldn't know that honestly. I'd have to find their official agreement and it'd be hard to find considering the time that has passed since.
 

j0ker

Capo di tutti capi
Jan 5, 2006
22,892
I'm trying to keep people realistic, amids all those newspapers who spew bullshit on a daily basis.


Sanchez and Neymar are the only wingers that offer a direct goalscoring treath. All the others are just fake midfielders or pacy crossers, but barcelona doesnt do crosses, cause good luck crossing to a 5feet player.

And the biggest problem Barcelona is facing, is that teams go roflmao double holding midfielders on messi+ anticipating fullback, and do what the fuck you want on the flanks, they wont cross anyway.
If you have actual goalscoring treaths on the flanks, it creates room for them to exploit.
Then, there is Sanchez himself, who said more then once that he wished to remain at barcelona.

So the only way to get Sanchez, is to offer Barcelona more then what they got for him, so they could re-invest it in some other player they consider better for their formation.

However, we dont have that much cash.


We could sell immobile, a very stupid idea, but then we'd still be unable to afford him.

Unless something happens and he is forced out or barcelona is forced to sell, sanchez will remain there
I get your point, and yes I agree that if they want to keep him we have no chance but the thing is that they seem to want Hazard or Reus.

And never underestimate the stupidity of rich teams, remember Ibra - Etoo'o saga.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
You two :lol:

- - - Updated - - -

I wouldn't know that honestly.
If i recall correctly, that was the point the previous time aswel

As it stands in the books, we had 13 mil per annum, and increase to 23.25mil per annum. Slightly over 10 mil increase
And it would be financially logical that that 13mil is pure and alone the sponsering.

So Nike , like addidas will, is also paying a sum for the licencing and merchandising, but we dont know how much, we only know that Addidas will pay 6 mil.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
I get your point, and yes I agree that if they want to keep him we have no chance but the thing is that they seem to want Hazard or Reus.

And never underestimate the stupidity of rich teams, remember Ibra - Etoo'o saga.
Good point :D

If they want Hazard, they are gonna have to pay very VERY much. It could open them to accepting a lesser offer for Sanchez. But we would definatly had to sell immobile's half to be able to get there.
Wich is sad, cause he'd be an excellent backup for llorente. If not a replacement if he continues to grow like this

- - - Updated - - -

Dint we strike that Nike deal in 2003 ? Or when was the last renewal ?
Regardless of time, there was allready a different payment for the licencing and merchandising rights. I'd be surprised if it was just half of what we'll be getting
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 84)