General Religion & Philosophy Discussion Thread (17 Viewers)

[Bianconero_Aus]

Steroids are totally owned ur brain

All your steroids are belong to us.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[ZoSo]

In mother russia you make steroid strong

- - - Updated - - -

In mother russia you shrink steroid's balls

 

[Linebreak]

Flying Spaghetti Monster - speaks volumes.

 

[Trequartista]

Flying Spaghetti Monster - speaks volumes.

about?

 

[Linebreak]

about?

Individuals that use this term to make a point.

 

[Trequartista]

I prefer using leprechauns.

 

[Linebreak]

I prefer using leprechauns.

Same sheet different smell.

 

[Trequartista]

Well, there is no more evidence for the existence of a deity than for leprechauns, that's a fact.

 

[Linebreak]

Well, there is no more evidence for the existence of a deity than for leprechauns, that's a fact.

So it's no different to believe in God than to believe in a flying spaghetti pink leprechaun monster?

 

[Trequartista]

Yep.

 

[Linebreak]

Yep.

Wow - speaks infinite volumes.

 

[Trequartista]

How so?

I don't find it less logical than saying that imagining that your friend has a brain is blind faith.

 

[Linebreak]

How so?

I don't find it less logical than saying that imagining that your friend has a brain is blind faith.

Why does no sane person fervently defend the existence of leprechauns but many do of God? There's no point in "discussing" really.

 

[Trequartista]

The above is an appeal to popularity (argumentum ad populum).

Don't use logical fallacies, they just make you look silly.

 

[Linebreak]

The above is an appeal to popularity (argumentum ad populum).

Don't use logical fallacies, they just make you look silly.

I knew that, being the typical run of the mill atheist, you'd jump straight onto that.

No one has ever come up with a theory of leprechauns creating and sustaining the world, meaning there's no comparison with the existence of God, so your the one that looks silly making such a comparison.

 

[ALC]

The above is an appeal to popularity (argumentum ad populum).

Don't use logical fallacies, they just make you look silly.

You're really gonna point out the use of logical fallacies in a thread debating religion?

 

[Trequartista]

That's not the point, the point is that there is no evidence for neither.

In that respect, the comparison is spot on.

You're really gonna point out the use of logical fallacies in a thread debating religion?

I usually wouldn't but Linebreak is the kind of guy who could benefit from being educated.

 

[Linebreak]

That's not the point, the point is that there is no evidence for neither.

In that respect, the comparison is spot on.

The universe itself is ample evidence of God.

 

[ALC]

I knew that, being the typical run of the mill atheist, you'd jump straight onto that.

No one has ever come up with a theory of leprechauns creating and sustaining the world, meaning there's no comparison with the existence of God, so your the one that looks silly making such a comparison.

and this is what i'm talking about. a post containing nothing but WTF-ery

 

[Trequartista]

There's universe itself is ample evidence of God.

Elaborate.