Gay High School (8 Viewers)

[Seven]

I guess this is wrong everywhere around the world.

No, it isn't.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Azzurri7]

as well as making this about " America vs. the rest of the world". sadly how most topics here take an amazing turn to

I don't like the American homosexuals though.

 

[Bjerknes]

Actually it does. Both AIDS and Syphilis could be caused by gay sex.

No, that's just not true, Fred. They can be TRANSMITTED through gay sex, AND heterosexual sex. AIDS can be CAUSED by the killing of CD4+ T cells, serious malnutrition, and also intense forms of medication that the body rejects (very unusual). Hence why HIV is called what it is... Human immunodeficiency virus.

Not Homo immuno virus.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

People of religion think homosexuality is a disease. Just another way religion divides the masses.

Here, masses = mentally retarded.

 

[Azzurri7]

No, it isn't.

I know what you're hinting at.

 

[Seven]

I don't like the American homosexuals though.

What really pisses me off is Australian homosexuals from Sydney (well, the five I've met). I must admit, I don't like most Australians to begin with, but by god they are annoying.

 

[Seven]

I know what you're hinting at.

I know you do and I suppose it's safest not to go any further into it.

 

[Azzurri7]

What really pisses me off is Australian homosexuals from Sydney (well, the five I've met). I must admit, I don't like most Australians to begin with, but by god they are annoying.

All five were homosexuals? Jeez.

 

[.zero]

I don't like the American homosexuals though.

why not? they are the best kind:scarf:

 

[Osman]

Actually it does. Both AIDS and Syphilis could be caused by gay sex.

Congratulations, you you are groundbreaking. Syphilis has been called everything from:

Until that time, as Fracastoro notes, syphilis had been called the "French disease" in Italy and Germany, and the "Italian disease" in France. In addition, the Dutch called it the "Spanish disease", the Russians called it the "Polish disease", the Turks called it the "Christian disease" or "Frank disease" (frengi) and the Tahitians called it the "British disease". These 'national' names are due to the disease often being present among invading armies or sea crews, due to the high incidence of unprotected sexual contact with prostitutes

But never the Gay disease until now Do you even KNOW how syphilis is transmitted if you deem it only gay sex related one

Considering how insanely common syphillis has been throughout history, its funny we the human race managed to survive when so many of us are homosexuals


P.S I am also in the mood for setting precedence too, and henceforth shall call syphillis "the Azzurri7 disease".

 

[Seven]

All five were homosexuals? Jeez.

I've met more Australians than five. But there was still an insanely high rate of homosexuality. I think that's because Australians want to stress the fact that they like everybody and are the most tolerant nation on earth.

I hate them all.

 

[Azzurri7]

I know you do and I suppose it's safest not to go any further into it.

I wont, because I'll easily agree with you concerning this topic. Though I think when It comes to murdering It's almost everywhere around the world...That includes United States.

 

[Fred]

No. You're wrong. AIDs and Syphilis are diseases and can be spread by heterosexual sex. Magic Johnson has HIV and he is hetero, Al Capone died of Syphilis and he was hetero. The idea that gay sex "causes" diseases is completely wrong. Sex doesn't cause disease, it spreads its.

No, they could spread, but they couldn't be caused by gay sex.

No, that's just not true, Fred. They can be TRANSMITTED through gay sex, AND heterosexual sex. AIDS can be CAUSED by the killing of CD4+ T cells, serious malnutrition, and also intense forms of medication that the body rejects (very unusual). Hence why HIV is called what it is... Human immunodeficiency virus.

Not Homo immuno virus.

yes thats true, thats what i meant anyway. wrong choice of words on my side.

 

[Cuti]

As the picture on facebook proves, a very large percentage of this forum is gay. If you do not have facebook and have no idea what i'm on about...tough

 

[rounder]

No man, i really wonder why do you think they can be cured.

I'm not being sarcastic nor am i going anywhere with this. I didn't read much literature about this "problem" and i never really cared, but my logic suggests that they were born homosexual just like i've been born heterosexual.
If i lived in different environment ( antique) i may have had sex with another male (because that was the way of life), but by nature i'd have been heterosexual and i'd get hard on women, not men.
The same goes for them. They get hard on men not because they chose that or they were taught that way, but simply because that's how they were born.

I may be wrong, of course. Like i said i never talked to an expert and i didn't read much about this. But this reasoning sounds logical to me.

I was asking you about how do you reason these things and why do you think it's curable.

I always thought people were gay because of envormental effect from the people, television etc.. I don't think people are just simple born gay. In many communities you would find more gay people than in other communities. Why is that? Does the chemica makeup of a baby suddenly change when you change location? Unlikely. A more reasonable explanation would be the enviroment. If a person grew up in a place where homosexuality was promoted in one way or another, we would likely see more gay people in that area. Wheras, in an enviroment that does not promote homosexuality in any way, it is unlikely that you would find many homosexuals there.

Gay people are usually found in cities rather than villages. This is due to the openess of the enviroment. A person would be encouraged to experiment homosexuality. In conservative areas such as most villages, people would hardly even think of practicing gay sex.

This is what I think. I conclude this from personal observation.

In America we have different standards of "right" and "wrong". In America it is "right" to stick up for the little guy, to give everyone a chance and blah blah. However it is "wrong" to murder and "wrong" to beat your wife.

A while back, the practice of homosexuality was also considered wrong. Not anymore though. I wouldn't be surprised if something like beating one's wife may one day be excusable for example/ It seems ridiculous to us now, but homosexuality also seemed ridiculous to previous generations when it is widely accepted nowadays.

 

[Dinsdale]

Then it wouldn't be much of an argument would it?

I agree, it is my opinion, but it is not only my opinion. Many people agree with me, maybe it's different in Western culture where you are more open to such matters. However, I come from a conservative region in the world and we still don't accept gay behaviour as normal as you do. To us, their behaviour is wrong. We still believe in "right" and "wrong" wheras, in America, anything seems acceptable. Nothing is right or wrong. You have been raised to accept all kinds of people, this is mainly because of racism issues America has faced in the past. It could explain why most Americans are very passionate towards accepting any kinds of people.

I come from a country where racism was never a problem. Therefore, we still judge people in a relatively insensitive way because we have never had a reason to radically rid of our prejudice mentality unlike America.

Ultimately, when I say I hate gays here in my country, I would receive nods of agreement. While in the states, it wouldn't be quite the same.

Define right - wrong and normal - abnormal.

For me, and I think for most Western people, something is wrong when it can hurt/damage external people or objects. Being gay obviously doesn't hurt anyone, so which definition of 'wrong' implies that homosexuality is wrong? I suppose you're going to answer because it is against nature or human nature, thus abnormal. Which brings us to the definition of normal. How do you define 'normal' so that homosexuality can be categorized abnormal. And, most importantly, how does abnormal imply wrong?

Actually it does. Both AIDS and Syphilis could be caused by gay sex.

It can be caused by unprotected sex. I don't understand why you seem to think unprotected sex and homosexuality are the same. (edit: never mind. you already answered to this)

 

[JCK]

Some opinions in the past few pages are hilarious, they took me back to the enlightenment period. Hilarious in a bad kind of way.

 

[Azzurri7]

why not? they are the best kind:scarf:

I don't like how they "taste"

I've met more Australians than five. But there was still an insanely high rate of homosexuality. I think that's because Australians want to stress the fact that they like everybody and are the most tolerant nation on earth.

I hate them all.

High rate of Homosexuality in Australia? Thats something new to me..... They've always given me a different impression.

 

[Seven]

Actually it does. Both AIDS and Syphilis could be caused by gay sex.

Syphilis was never associated with homosexuality.

AIDS was, but only because scientists couldn't come up with a better idea. And from the very beginning in fact they knew gay people weren't the only ones with a higher risk factor. Heroin addicts, hemophiliacs, homosexuals and Haitians formed the original risk groups. Some have chosen to keep on believing that the disease is caused by homosexuality, but the amount of evidence against that idea is immense.

All of which you would have known had your religion allowed you to study these things.

 

[Osman]

Are you saying all of these people were closes homosexuals Fred?

Because only the one in bold was openly gay (Hitler prolly got syphillis because he had the fetish of having his helgas and Gretas pee on his face).

Notable known and suspected syphilis-infected people in previous centuries

Keys: S - suspected case; † - died of syphilis

* Idi Amin (1928-2003) Ugandan dictator S
* Maurice Barrymore (1849-1905) actor †
* Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867), poet †
* Karen Blixen (1885-1962), writer
* Manuel Maria Barbosa du Bocage (1765-1805), poet †
* António Botto (1897-1959), poet
* Camilo Castelo Branco (1825-1890), writer
* Beau Brummell (1778-1840), fashion arbiter
* Al Capone (1899-1947), gangster †
* Randolph Churchill, Lord (1849-1895), British statesman and father of Winston S. Churchill S
* Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley (1545-1567), second husband of Mary Queen of Scots
* Frederick Delius (1862-1934), composer †
* Gaetano Donizetti (1797-1848), composer
* King Edward VI (1538-1553), King of England and third Tudor monarch S
* Mihai Eminescu (1850-1889), poet S
* Paul Gauguin (1848-1903), painter †
* Klement Gottwald (1896-1953), Czechoslovakian politician S
* Heinrich Heine (1797-1856), poet †
* King Henry VIII (1491-1547), King of England and second monarch of the Tudor dynasty S
* Adolf Hitler (1889–1945), German dictator S
* Ivan the Terrible (1530-1584), Czar of Russia
* Scott Joplin (1867/8-1917), composer †
* Vladimir Lenin (1870-1924), communist leader S
* Édouard Manet (1832-1883), painter †
* Guy de Maupassant (1850-1893), writer †
* Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1844-1900), 19th century German philosopher S
* Jack Pickford (1896-1933), actor †
* Martin Alonzo Pinzon (1441-1493) captain of the Pinta †
* Eugen Sandow (1867-1925), bodybuilder S[18]
* Franz Schubert (1797-1828), composer S
* Robert Schumann (1810-1856), composer S
* Bedřich Smetana (1824-1884), Czech composer S
* Tongzhi (1856-1875), ninth Manchu emperor in the Qing dynasty S
* Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (1864-1901), painter †
* John Wilmot (1647-1680), 2nd Earl of Rochester, writer, debaucher S
* Oscar Wilde (1854-1900), writer S
* Hugo Wolf (1860-1903), composer †
* Mikhail Vrubel (1856-1910), painter
* Vincent Van Gogh (1853-1890), painter S
* Kostas Karyotakis (1896-1928), Greek poet