Gay High School (3 Viewers)

Jun 13, 2007
7,233
It's probably a true theory. Everybody knows there are some excessively hateful homophobes who are homosexual themselves. Do not deny a factual scientific study just because it's not convenient for you.



Exactly why nobody should take you seriously and exactly why you're a horrifying bigot. The gays don't need a cure, you do.
The theory itself indeed is true, however, it cannot be applied to someone like me. I don't like homos because they annoy me, their behaviour actually annoys a lot more people than you think. The theory refers to people that can't be around homos because it triggers feelings that they refuse to acknowledge. I'm not denying the study in its validity, I am denying the way you guys believe it's applicable to anyone.

Countless people don't like homos, it doesn't mean they're gay. If you refuse to acknowledge that; then you are a mindless moron that lacks common sense.

As a matter of fact, you are absolutely right. You shouldn't have taken me seriously. I wasn't intending to be serious. You actually thought I was serious when I said all gays should die? Give me a break, I thought this thread is ridiculous in the first place and felt like making a tenacious statement. You and Enron got up on your highhorses and began throwing insults at me for no apparent reason.

Obviously, I had to defend myself. You couldn't understand that I was overly exaggerating how I felt, you didn't seem to scratch your little brains and think twice, you instead just insulted me and you continue to insult me.

If you don't think people should take me seriously because I didn't know Animals were fags; then that's your stupid opinion.

No, I don't need a cure for saying I hate gay people in a forum. You do for acting like a little emotional bitch after getting her fucking period.

Chill the fuck about and stop acting like a little sissy, calmly analyze what someone says next time instead of mindlessly bitching like a clueless moron. Get a grip fool.
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
The theory itself indeed is true, however, it cannot be applied to someone like me. I don't like homos because they annoy me, their behaviour actually annoys a lot more people than you think. The theory refers to people that can't be around homos because it triggers feelings that they refuse to acknowledge. I'm not denying the study in its validity, I am denying the way you guys believe it's applicable to anyone.
Just to make one thing clear. There's a difference between being annoyed with people and being hateful. There's nothing wrong with being annoyed, tons of people annoy me all the time. But from what you've said it's fairly obvious that your condition is more than an annoyance. You can't even bring yourself to refer to homosexuals by a neutral term, you keep calling the fags.


Obviously, I had to defend myself. You couldn't understand that I was overly exaggerating how I felt, you didn't seem to scratch your little brains and think twice, you instead just insulted me and you continue to insult me.

Chill the fuck about and stop acting like a little sissy, calmly analyze what someone says next time instead of mindlessly bitching like a clueless moron. Get a grip fool.
Interesting how you went from victimizing yourself (omg I was attacked) to mounting a new attack in just a few paragraphs.
 
Jun 13, 2007
7,233
Just to make one thing clear. There's a difference between being annoyed with people and being hateful. There's nothing wrong with being annoyed, tons of people annoy me all the time. But from what you've said it's fairly obvious that your condition is more than an annoyance. You can't even bring yourself to refer to homosexuals by a neutral term, you keep calling the fags.




Interesting how you went from victimizing yourself (omg I was attacked) to mounting a new attack in just a few paragraphs.
I dislike gay people, I would say that hate might just be too strong a word. I don't want to kill gay people, I'm am just not to accordance with what they represent, who they are..

I call them fags because it's shorter than "homosexuals" which is 7 letters longer.
Stop trying to immitate psycologists, I use "fag" because it is a lot more conveniant and short.

I was attacked; I didn't attack Andy. He wasnted to call me a bigot and kept moaning and bitching all the time. He was annoying, he reminded me of the way I felt about gay people, annoyance. Not hate.

I think you are just going to have to trust my judgement on whether I dislike and am annoyed by fags or whether I have extreme hate towards them. I know what hate is; I hate Hitler, I hate dictatorship, I hate arrogant people, and I dislike gay people, Interistas, Moratti. I hope you see what I'm trying to hint at here.

There is a massive difference to whether I truly hate gays or just dislike them. It's clearly the latter despite the fact that I may have given the false impression that I hate them. Like I said, I was exaggerating my feelings. Now kindly let that go already.

I'm not attacking Andy; I am only voicing my opinion. I think he's way too serious and bitchy about this whole thing; he needs to understand repeatingly calling someone a bigot is not witty or clever, it's quite retarded. I am just suggesting that next time he should think twice before blatantly attacking someone. It's annoying to have to deal with people who take your words amazingly literally.

I don't like attacking or insulting people like I said before, but when someone continuously insults you, I really have no choice but to respond. I think I have done so in a fairly resonable manner.
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
Fag is not a neutral, accepted term, it's a slur. When you talk in slurs, that says something about you.

It's annoying to have to deal with people who take your words amazingly literally.
Excuse me? Then how would you like your words to be taken? There are your own words, noone made you write what you wrote. And now you don't like people reacting to them?
 
OP
Bjerknes

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,169
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #353
    The theory itself indeed is true, however, it cannot be applied to someone like me. I don't like homos because they annoy me, their behaviour actually annoys a lot more people than you think. The theory refers to people that can't be around homos because it triggers feelings that they refuse to acknowledge. I'm not denying the study in its validity, I am denying the way you guys believe it's applicable to anyone.

    Countless people don't like homos, it doesn't mean they're gay. If you refuse to acknowledge that; then you are a mindless moron that lacks common sense.

    As a matter of fact, you are absolutely right. You shouldn't have taken me seriously. I wasn't intending to be serious. You actually thought I was serious when I said all gays should die? Give me a break, I thought this thread is ridiculous in the first place and felt like making a tenacious statement. You and Enron got up on your highhorses and began throwing insults at me for no apparent reason.

    Obviously, I had to defend myself. You couldn't understand that I was overly exaggerating how I felt, you didn't seem to scratch your little brains and think twice, you instead just insulted me and you continue to insult me.

    If you don't think people should take me seriously because I didn't know Animals were fags; then that's your stupid opinion.

    No, I don't need a cure for saying I hate gay people in a forum. You do for acting like a little emotional bitch after getting her fucking period.

    Chill the fuck about and stop acting like a little sissy, calmly analyze what someone says next time instead of mindlessly bitching like a clueless moron. Get a grip fool.
    You come with nothing more than verbal diarrhea and bigotry. Nobody should even bother dealing with you anymore. You're just making a fool out of yourself and you can see it as well with all your back-tracking and inane comments.
     
    Jun 13, 2007
    7,233
    Fag is not a neutral, accepted term, it's a slur. When you talk in slurs, that says something about you.



    Excuse me? Then how would you like your words to be taken? There are your own words, noone made you write what you wrote. And now you don't like people reacting to them?
    When you say for example that you want to destroy the pentagon because you hate the way the American army has been operating. If I were an American citizen reading your post, should I call the pentagon and warn them that someone is planning on destroying them?

    I thought it was easy to tell when someone was exaggerating, apparently I was wrong.
     

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
    When you say for example that you want to destroy the pentagon because you hate the way the American army has been operating. If I were an American citizen reading your post, should I call the pentagon and warn them that someone is planning on destroying them?
    Is that what happened? Did Enron call the gay people and tell them you were going to kill them?

    I'll tell you why he took your words at face value. Because lots of other people have said things like that in the past, you're not the first. It fits a pattern.
     

    Enron

    Tickle Me
    Moderator
    Oct 11, 2005
    75,665
    Is that what happened? Did Enron call the gay people and tell them you were going to kill them?

    I'll tell you why he took your words at face value. Because lots of other people have said things like that in the past, you're not the first. It fits a pattern.
    Here you go Martin:

    Originally posted by JuveRevolution.

    "Does this mean that the teachers are gay too? I can't imagine a straight teacher teaching a gay school.

    Anyway, I will openly admit that I am a homophobe. I sincerely believe that they should all die a painful death. They are what is wrong with our society, they are parasites that live among us.

    Leave the Lesbians alone though, they're hot."
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)