I thought only post-soviet block countries are looking negatively to homosexuality. But some respectable users here are too. Well, I guess that's how the life goes
Buy on AliExpress.com
Gay couples as fit to adopt as heterosexuals: study (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Martin
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
Animals can have mental disorders as well 
Is having kinky sex a mental disorder? The extra shit isn't necessary for evolution, there's pain involved, and it only occurs in a small percentage of the population?
Does liking blowjobs mean you have a mental disorder? They're not necessary for evolution either.
Yeah, but it's not that simple. Like Hoori said, homosexuals have existed and been part of communities for a long time. In the past, not having their own children, meant that they acted as baby-sitters pretty much. They have played a big role in communities and continue to do so. That's different from a mental disability where acting on your urges cases pain to the rest.
Yeah, but it's not that simple. Like Hoori said, homosexuals have existed and been part of communities for a long time. In the past, not having their own children, meant that they acted as baby-sitters pretty much. They have played a big role in communities and continue to do so. That's different from a mental disability where acting on your urges cases pain to the rest.
Not exactly. Incest is a problem, because it can create severely handicapped children. Pedophilia is a problem because it damages the child, while necrophilia would hurt the family of the deceased. These people are for a big part probably born with their fetish, but are not allowed to act upon it, because we place the mental and physical wellbeing of others above their satisfaction. Gay dex happens between two consenting adults and creates no issues.
This is neither difficult nor complex. It is actually very easy.
This is neither difficult nor complex. It is actually very easy.
1) sometimes to understand one has to do his homework and understand how things work instead of going for easy inadequate comparisons
2) that is rich since onus is on him and he got found out red handed making an outlandish non sequitur, but fine i dont mind answering it:
19th amendment look it up
lastly, you really should drop the opinion judge routine if you want to be taken seriously
But I didn't see Martin saying that the supreme court has the jurisdiction to legalize gay marriage.
BTW Chief Justice Roberts said it best:
"Petitioners make strong arguments rooted in social policy and considerations of fairness. They contend that same-sex couples should be allowed to affirm their love and commitment through marriage, just like opposite-sex couples. That position has undeniable appeal; over the past six years, voters and legislators in eleven States and the District of Columbia have revised their laws to allow marriage between two people of the same sex. But this Court is not a legislature. Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us. Under the Constitution, judges have power to say what the law is, not what it should be. The people who ratified the Constitution authorized courts to exercise “neither force nor will but merely judgment.”
Although the policy arguments for extending marriage to same-sex couples may be compelling, the legal arguments for requiring such an extension are not"