Gay Adoption (7 Viewers)
- Thread starter Sheik Yerbouti
- Start date
But, and not to speak for Andy, it's a fair argument among gays to suggest that some of the institutionalized ridicule and discrimination they suffer is equally a great deal of personal pain and suffering. Pain and suffering that might only be demonstrated by someone else making such shocking statements about their own beloved institutions.
I honestly don't think enough has been said in this thread for the social persecution gays feel as a result of culturally accepted viewpoints, many of which have been expressed here. As much as I hate the speech, I do think it demonstrates a shocking point. How shocking that might be to someone on the other side of this issue might only become apparent when it is instead turned on their own cherished institutions and belief systems. So it's relevant because it makes that point clear.
It's a bit of eye-for-an-eye, and I don't like it for making the whole world blind of course, but then again that's in the Old Testament.
I honestly don't think enough has been said in this thread for the social persecution gays feel as a result of culturally accepted viewpoints, many of which have been expressed here. As much as I hate the speech, I do think it demonstrates a shocking point. How shocking that might be to someone on the other side of this issue might only become apparent when it is instead turned on their own cherished institutions and belief systems. So it's relevant because it makes that point clear.
It's a bit of eye-for-an-eye, and I don't like it for making the whole world blind of course, but then again that's in the Old Testament.
But, and not to speak for Andy, it's a fair argument among gays to suggest that some of the institutionalized ridicule and discrimination they suffer is equally a great deal of personal pain and suffering. Pain and suffering that might only be demonstrated by someone else making such shocking statements about their own beloved institutions.
I honestly don't think enough has been said in this thread for the social persecution gays feel as a result of culturally accepted viewpoints, many of which have been expressed here. As much as I hate the speech, I do think it demonstrates a shocking point. How shocking that might be to someone on the other side of this issue might only become apparent when it is instead turned on their own cherished institutions and belief systems. So it's relevant because it makes that point clear.
It's a bit of eye-for-an-eye, and I don't like it for making the whole world blind of course, but then again that's in the Old Testament.
I honestly don't think enough has been said in this thread for the social persecution gays feel as a result of culturally accepted viewpoints, many of which have been expressed here. As much as I hate the speech, I do think it demonstrates a shocking point. How shocking that might be to someone on the other side of this issue might only become apparent when it is instead turned on their own cherished institutions and belief systems. So it's relevant because it makes that point clear.
It's a bit of eye-for-an-eye, and I don't like it for making the whole world blind of course, but then again that's in the Old Testament.
I can't believe that's still up. forza Andy.
Andy's posts rarely further discussion. That's true whether you're talking about gays, hip hop, or Juve's defense. He seldom offers much these days beyond the molotov cocktail lob to make a point, but I also believe that making a point serves a function or a point of reference.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. used to tell Malcolm X how much he needed X's extremist viewpoints to make his own beliefs on civil rights seem a lot more moderate. Maybe Malcolm X didn't serve as much to useful discourse as MLK did on the matter, but he still served an important function overall.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. used to tell Malcolm X how much he needed X's extremist viewpoints to make his own beliefs on civil rights seem a lot more moderate. Maybe Malcolm X didn't serve as much to useful discourse as MLK did on the matter, but he still served an important function overall.
but you as a person who argues on his side when you came into the thread and saw that should have called him out and said it was extreme and disrespectful but yet you didnt. If it was a person of faith calling an atheist names you would have told him to shut it. So it seems your hypocritical my friend
He can say what he wants ??? If i call someone black i'm labelled a racist, you say something about jews you are antisemic...But when it's about Islam it's freedom of speech.
Sorry he's just an ignorant peice of shit who should be banned, or at least get an infraction but because he's freind with mods he won't
Sorry he's just an ignorant peice of shit who should be banned, or at least get an infraction but because he's freind with mods he won't