Gaetano D'Agostino (9 Viewers)

[Esteban]

Alas, that is why you have your lunch stolen daily However, I do agree with you when it comes to shipping him out to gain more experience (but not an outright sale) if and only if Criscito is coming back. If we are planning to send him away, and rely on Molinaro and buy mediocre players like Dossena and Grosso , then I'm totally against it :faq1: :luckyluke:

My head hurts.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[JCK]

 

[Mark]

There was/is a meeting between Juve and Udinese. SKY Sport 24 report the clubs are far from a deal. Udinese still want one of Giovinco or Marchisio.

I think the deal will happen and it's gonna close to what Juve want since the player really wants Juve.

 

[Cronios]

Do you know you are full of shit?
I mean, seriously, I read in one of your posts, that Diego isnt good enough. And the other way you mention this immense quality signing, like you are with this post, is that we overpaid for him, not that it was necessary, a MUST to sign, but that we overpaid.

Are you drunk or smth?? I said that HE is too good for us, i said that we are not the step forward to him, i never said that he is not good for us, thats ridiculous!!

You either confuse me with someone else or you have taken smth out of context. Like me saying that Ribery would have been a better choice, well i dont deny that,
but it doesnt matter that Diego isnt good enough for us though!!

This is just crazy!

Same thing with this statement of Udinese's president, it wont happen AT ALL, 0% we will give them Marchisio or Giovinco, but ofcourse for you its an easy material to nag about. Just like you nagged for like 3 months about how we would lose Giovinco for that crappy Amauri player, which what do you know, didnt happen, and shocker, Amauri turned out to be a great signing.

I never said that we are going to sell Giovinco or Marchisio, i dont think we will do that for a lesser player, since we didnt do that for Amauri!
But i said that we might lose DC and destroy Marchisio's carrier by keeping him on the bench for the next 3-5 years or so...
He is a starter and we are going to turn him into a subber for no particular reason!
Thats what i am saying!!

An upgrade? Yes. A huge up grade I'm not so sure. Marchisio is younger than him.
Potential? No. D'Ago has reached or almost reached his prime. Marchisio hasn't.

Then if he is not a real upgrade, we dont we replace our weaklings first??
Why dont we buy a player of Dago's quality, but at RB? That would be huge upgrade to our current material, who is either decent or promising!
Why do we tolerate mediocrity there and we are hurry to turn Marchisio into a sub?? Marchisio was decent and if we give him the necessary time and space, might develop into a great starter! We also have some decent subs, in case he doesnt (Poulsen and buy him, we also sacrificed the funds that could upgrade our RB since last year)

Not unless we get Criscito (I'm starting to doubt we will).

And what happens if we dont?? Is it wise to create one more hole in our left flank??

There's no way Poulsen will be ahead of him in the pecking order and Camo probably won't be either.

I think, you are wrong because of that:

For me, Camo is the perfect player to play CM on the right side (I think he played that role under Lippi?) in a 3-CM/DMs formation. He has it all to be a good CM and can provide the width as well. You can't repy solely on fullbacks to play on the band.

Ciro knows him and trust him, he is a NT starter and at his day, by far the best midfielder we have. If/when he is fit, we hill be a starter!!
Sissoko in the middle and a fair contest between Poulsen and Marchisio for the left side. If D'ago joins as the new messiah, he will send them both to the bench and they will fight with CZ and Tiago/Almiron for the a substitution place!

Unless we get a replacement LB!
He'll be used as a LB if we get him.

You are assuming here! Just because you wish we might do that and it doent mean that Secco is able to do that, or even if he is willing to do that!
Thats why i said lest fix our defense start and then we can build from there!
ATM, we didnt add any new wing-backs, but we are closely to lose our most promising one!

How is Dossena more promising than DC?

He is not!!
And thats the point, we are going to be stacked with mediocrity for no good reason!!

We're supposed to be building a team for the future here. We can't just go out and buy everybody all the time.

We ve been saying that for 2 years but no one listens...

And it's not like DC is some run of the mill, average 22-year old. He's pretty good and can play two different positions, so can we fucking keep him and give him a chance please?

Few ppl remember his days with us in serie B. But what infuriates me the most, is just because CR never gave him a real chance, many members him consider him a flop and wouldnt mind him go! Same with Criscito...

 

[Alen]

Cronios, the board might make transfer decisions, but it's the coach who makes the team and decides who plays and who won't play.
If Ferrara plays D'Agostino in front of Marchisio then he'll probably have a reason to do it.
But i don't think it will be the case. If we do buy D'Agostino i can see a Sissoko-D'Agostino-Marchisio trio in midfield, with Diego in front of them. Mauro is 33 but his age doesn't matter as much as his injuries (he missed at least 50% of last two seasons) and his drop of form do. I can easily see Camoranesi losing his place in the team to a CM because from the transfers we're making it looks pretty obvious that we won't play 4-4-2 with wingers.

Once you asked (actually, you asked more than once) what can D'Agostino offer more than Marchisio and Poulsen.
It's like asking what can Pirlo offer more than Gattuso and Ambrosini.
I'm not talking quality wise but i'm talking about the characteristics of the players. D'Ago is nothing similar to Poulsen and Marchisio.

Also, there has been lots of talks about the new formation. Some say 4-2-3-1 some say 4-3-2-1, but i can see Ferrara playing 4-3-1-2, with 3 excellent tacklers in midfield (one of them a playmaker the other two destroyers) and with Diego behind two strikers. With so much quality in the attacking department i can't see us playing with one striker and with no interest in buying wingers i can't see us playing 4-4-2.

 

[JuveJay]

Those two could easily co-exist in that middle three, Marchisio on the right side and D'Agostino on the left.

I don't think people should suggest that at a team like Juve there will be 11 players who are first choice, there are many options available to Ferrara next season and that is a good thing, players will be picked on merit.

 

[Oggy]

now we are doomed because Diego is too good for Juve

I mean for real now, you repeat yourself in every freakin thread. I accepted when you said that you want good discussion and everything, but c'mon... Copy-paste in every thread is not discussion. And I love how you presume things, like Secco will never buy anyone, Marchisio will be benched for decade etc.

I think that even a bleach can't take your black thoughts.

 

[Amaurisimo]

my only problem with all this is, why dont we get full backs before someone like D'Agostino.

 

[neurosis21]

Those two could easily co-exist in that middle three, Marchisio on the right side and D'Agostino on the left.

I don't think people should suggest that at a team like Juve there will be 11 players who are first choice, there are many options available to Ferrara next season and that is a good thing, players will be picked on merit.

totally agree with you.especially if we are going to aim for bothh serieA and CL we need squad depth and more that 11 starters available
let them fight for their place

mark keeps us informed of the meeting outcome

 

[Mark]

The 2 clubs didn't come to an agreement after the meeting. The deal can still go on but not now. - SKY


Gurus, a fax as been sent to another club. The player is in the NT pot. Palombo? Maybe Marotta can help us out?

 

[Bjerknes]

There was/is a meeting between Juve and Udinese. SKY Sport 24 report the clubs are far from a deal. Udinese still want one of Giovinco or Marchisio.

I think the deal will happen and it's gonna close to what Juve want since the player really wants Juve.

If we have to relinquish one of those two players, then I'm sorry, I can't say yes to this deal.

 

[Oggy]

Isn't Palombo another defensive oriented midfielder???

 

[Mark]

If we have to relinquish one of those two players, then I'm sorry, I can't say yes to this deal.

That's what Juve did. Now they're letting the word out on an interest about another mid so Udinese lower their demands. If not then we'll go for somebody else. Juve management didn't look happy after the meeting.

 

[Mark]

Isn't Palombo another defensive oriented midfielder???

Yeah but he can pass a ball and make long balls too. He's got a nice rocket with his right foot also. I wouldn't mind him if we keep Tiago.

 

[Cronios]

If we pay an arm and a leg, to get slightly better player than Marchisio.
Ciro will be forced to use, both because of the sacrifices we made to get him and because that he is at optimal age and condition.
Even if he is marginally better, he will be chosen and that would be the best tactical choice.

BUT, it doesnt matter it is a logical strategical choice! Our board has shown that they lack vision and they have similarly wasted great amounts of cash that could have been used much more wisely!

This is what i am arguing and the only reason i am against this transfer, considering the current facts and future prospects!

I dont think that Marchisio is a DM like Gattuso, i believe that he is more like a Lampard type of player, a true CM, not DM, neither AMF.
I believe that as his teamwork will improve, his passing and overall offensive efficiency and utility will also improve!
But if he is permanently because of Dago, or Poulsen, he wont have the necessary time to evolve into such a player, at least not as fast as he would, if he was a part of our team, for all those year.
On the bench, he will reach at Dago's level near Dago's age, but a starter, i believe he can reach there in a couple of years!

Now on the event, Dago be proved a flop and Marchisio a starter,
thats even worse, because we would have wasted all those resources for one more subber.

One of the reasons i insisted we cant play a 4-2-3-1, is because we lack the numbers of hardcore DMs like Sissoko and specialized AMFs.
Dago adds nothing to it!!
He is not pacey and offensive enough to be one of the 3 AMFs (unlike Diego, Giovinvo and Camo)
and not solid enough to play as a DM, with dedicated defensive duties alone (like Sissoko)

So , i was expecting a 4-3-1-2, for the reasons i stated, before Ferrara confirmed them!
And in this formation, Dago can only play one the lateral roles beside Sissoko!
For this formation to survive the rapping from the flanks, we either need some kick @ss fullbacks, or a winger able to play as CM too, someone like Camo, who can also defend better than Giovinco, when needed.

There fore i believe that the rCM will be Camo and i was hoping that Marchisio will get the other one, but if Dago joins, Marchisio will be benched!

To conclude, i think that the worst possible moment to buy Dago, because he is very overhyped now and he will be overpriced too!
And we must not do that in the expend of our defensive enhancements and Marchisio's future! These are the only reasons, that put me against this transfer!

If we manage to subdue them them, then i will also welcome Dago too.
Just like i said last year when we were adding the useful squad player Poulsen.
He is not top quality material and he will never be WC either!
We should trust Marchisio and only buy him, if we sell Tiago or Poulsen first.

We should better use that sum for defensive replacements!

I see not that the history repeats herself!!

Canna is the new Mellberg and Dago is the new Poulsen,
in the mean time we are stuck with Molinaro and Grygera as starters and we cant sell Tiago and Almiron...
I just dont want to see the same outcome once again...

This was the expected outcome just after we have bought Poulsen last year too and i ve received the same flames back then...

 

[Hust]

my only problem with all this is, why dont we get full backs before someone like D'Agostino.

The mercato hasn't even officially started yet has it? And we have already signed 2 good players and almost a third. Wait until the end of summer and then complain about not signing fullbacks if one hasn't been signed yet. Dang, we still have 2 and a half months. The board has moved much quicker this year plus we have a new coach that KNOWS how to defend and surely he would like a replacement there. I am sure we will get someone in that department and if we don't sign a new RB this year our season will not be a failure so don't write off your club before the season even begins just because the mercato did not go YOUR way.

I will say it again and its probably the 4th time I have had to type this. We need someone in midfield that looks to receive the ball and is able to distribute it well enough to keep the flow of play going smoothly. We all know Sissoko can't pass, Marchisio will develope into something similar to that but what D'ago will bring those two can not. Camo is only an attacking mid and Diego/Gio drive our attack. We need someone that sits back, collects the ball from the defense and continues the run of play through the midfield (effectively taking pressure off our defense). Too many times last year and if you have noticed this then you need to watch some games again but how many times did our defense just clear the ball up field bypassing the midfield? D'ago will act as both a release valve for our defense and also someone that can finally connect all areas of the team into one cohesive unit. In otherwords we will have a midfield that actually operates in both attack and defense. We need someone that can put the ball (long or short) exactly where it's needed. Simple as that.

 

[Fellas]

Ok I understand that Udineses ds want to get as much as he can from this deal.

But is he really serious? wtf Marchisio and Giovinco in this deal hell no.

Give him 8-10 million euro 50% of De Ceglie and Paolucci.. if he says no then he can go to hell.

 

[Vini.Alarm]

If they want Giovinco or Marchisio they can keep DAgostino.

 

[Cronios]

Or DC, i may add...

 

[pavelnedy]

Why don't we offer Fernando Gago?At least he won't be 30m.