I see a young Thuram on Chiellini, he started out wide when he was young and he had the speed and the stamina to make a nice contribution up front and secure our flanks and then turned into a CB when he grew older
Not even close.
Thuram was a world class RB and he moved to CB only when he was 32 and he lost his speed.
I agree that the pattern is similar but with Giorgio it happened when he was only 22, when Casiraghi saw that he's a much much better CB than a LB.
I really don't know how can someone say that Chiellini isn't an average LB. He's very clumsy with the ball at his feet, he can't make a simple dribbling even if his life depends on it and technically he's very poor.
I'm lazy to check the serie B threads where people were shocked how whenever Giorgio plays one on one with someone (while we're attacking) he's losing the ball. He can't make crosses at full speed and he doesn't have the same stamina Zambrotta, or even Molinaro has, to be equally involved up front and at the back.
Yesterday i couldn't count a single cross he made but i'll take your word that he had 4 attempts for crosses. 4 attempts is nothing for a full back. Even Molinaro has an average of +3 successful crosses during a match and we know that he makes at least 3 times more unsuccessful crosses.
If Nedved was younger maybe we could do with a full back who's very strong defensively but inexistant in attack. But now we can't and with the players we have and the tactics we use we need a full back who'll run up and down, help the attack all the time and play good defense.
Molinaro maybe isn't such a player, but Chiellini definitely isn't.
It's open for discussion if he'll make a better LB than Molinaro but please don't tell me that he makes a good LB because he doesn't.
We finally found a world class CB and people want him to play LB. And then these same people say that a professional coach who earns millions for the job he's doing knows nothing about football and they claim to know better.
