Frederik Sørensen (22 Viewers)
- Thread starter Juventino[RUS]
- Start date
I guess I can't contest your analysis, Red...other than I see a possibility than he could be in Ogbonna's league by the time he reaches a similar age and we don't have any major defensive assets coming through the ranks other than Masi and Magnusson...Although, Pol 'pot' Garcia seems interesting and what of Rugani??? Has the defensive rock of our primavera headed back to Empoli from his loan deal with us without us having any of his registration????
Sorry but thats BS!
We have seen, we have experienced Bonucci.
Sorrensen cannot, at any case, turned into smth worse than that.
i dont remember if you have watched games both of them performed, but despite being so much younger and less experienced, Sorensen was far less mistake prone than Bonucci.
Bonucci s mistaked costed us dearly far too many times, no other defender was given so many chances, bar Molinaro. And the only thing those two had over Sorrensen, was Italian NT caps.
Lets stop fooling our selves, we are seeking defenders to complement a deeply flawed defence and we are only giving chances on Italians, this is not a coincidence, even today we are only buying the Pelusos or the Ogbonna becuase of their nationality.
If Peluso wasnt Italian for ex, he wouldnt even find a place in serie A, but here he comes joining the champions, only because of his nationality.
Sorensen already is already a better player than Peluso will ever be, so if he is not cut out of nationalistic reasons, he will find a place in competitive teams.
We have seen, we have experienced Bonucci.
Sorrensen cannot, at any case, turned into smth worse than that.
i dont remember if you have watched games both of them performed, but despite being so much younger and less experienced, Sorensen was far less mistake prone than Bonucci.
Bonucci s mistaked costed us dearly far too many times, no other defender was given so many chances, bar Molinaro. And the only thing those two had over Sorrensen, was Italian NT caps.
Lets stop fooling our selves, we are seeking defenders to complement a deeply flawed defence and we are only giving chances on Italians, this is not a coincidence, even today we are only buying the Pelusos or the Ogbonna becuase of their nationality.
If Peluso wasnt Italian for ex, he wouldnt even find a place in serie A, but here he comes joining the champions, only because of his nationality.
Sorensen already is already a better player than Peluso will ever be, so if he is not cut out of nationalistic reasons, he will find a place in competitive teams.
i ve explained in a really long post and in great detail, as objectively as i could.
I trust no one is in the mood to hesr it again and i dint have tge patience to track that post, but i ll sum it up, with what i remember.
We did allocatec 15 mil in cash from our transfer budget, paid in installments doesnt matter, as we havw a limit in annual budget allocation.
This sum was paid and starts as a common ground for all.
Now from there we have also participated in three more players sales, Criscito, Almiron and one more.
We have sold have of those players contracts for a price. Some of those negotiations would have happened anyway and would have add to our budget, this should not change the fact that 15 mil were allocated to Bonucci.
its like saying that because of the Giaccherrini sale, we actually bought Tevez for a couple of mils...
Whats more infuriating is that the players we have sold were sold in crazy low prices, only to sweaten the Bonucci deals, we have accepted to sell those players with huuge loses, only to make the Bonucci deal happen.
This was not in our financiasl interest, nor for such low fees, it only happened to get him, so instead of cutting the profit made from those deals to the 15 mil we alocated on Bonucci, we should rather add to the 15 mil the combinef ammount of loses that we have suffered, only to make this transfer happen.
Judging by those players market transfers right in the previous season and adding the combinef loses of capital, if i remember correctly, it adds up to a total loss of 21,5 mil.
That without counting the points, games and titles we have lost, so that Bonucci grows to a semi professional footballer, to a player that doesnt loses a game by himself...
I trust no one is in the mood to hesr it again and i dint have tge patience to track that post, but i ll sum it up, with what i remember.
We did allocatec 15 mil in cash from our transfer budget, paid in installments doesnt matter, as we havw a limit in annual budget allocation.
This sum was paid and starts as a common ground for all.
Now from there we have also participated in three more players sales, Criscito, Almiron and one more.
We have sold have of those players contracts for a price. Some of those negotiations would have happened anyway and would have add to our budget, this should not change the fact that 15 mil were allocated to Bonucci.
its like saying that because of the Giaccherrini sale, we actually bought Tevez for a couple of mils...
Whats more infuriating is that the players we have sold were sold in crazy low prices, only to sweaten the Bonucci deals, we have accepted to sell those players with huuge loses, only to make the Bonucci deal happen.
This was not in our financiasl interest, nor for such low fees, it only happened to get him, so instead of cutting the profit made from those deals to the 15 mil we alocated on Bonucci, we should rather add to the 15 mil the combinef ammount of loses that we have suffered, only to make this transfer happen.
Judging by those players market transfers right in the previous season and adding the combinef loses of capital, if i remember correctly, it adds up to a total loss of 21,5 mil.
That without counting the points, games and titles we have lost, so that Bonucci grows to a semi professional footballer, to a player that doesnt loses a game by himself...
