Frank Lampard is better than Zidane (4 Viewers)

#10

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2002
7,377
#21
++ [ originally posted by Chxta ] ++


And why can't he be on steroids? Get one thing straight, I never said he is on steroids, I said I am beginning to consider steroid use.

If Lampard is so entertaining, then why is it that everyone is calling his team boring?

Back in the day I knew people who used to tune on or go to matches just to watch Zizou play. How many people tune in to Chelsea to watch just Lampard?

And why does your Platini remind me of Mourinho?
I for one tune into watch chelsea, specifically the latest Lampard strikes. Chelsea may not play with style and flair, but they dominate and gennerally win games.......where have we heard that before....not all football has to be played like the selecao.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
Feb 26, 2005
591
#23
This argument is similar to the spectacularly stupid English press touting Wayne Rooney as being greater than Pele. Comparing Lampard to Ronaldinho is one thing, as they are roughly the same age, but to compare Lampard to Zidane is, as Chxta put it, heresy. Lampard is not and will never be in Zidane's class for one simple reason- Zidane is in a class all his own. In his prime, nobody could touch him. He was the greastest midfielder of his generation.

Right now, he is 33 and ready to quit the stage. Lampard is 25, and on his way up. Will he ever get to the level where his name can reasonably be mentioned in the same breath as Zidane's? Maybe, maybe not. But to do so now is plain heresy.

As for steroid use, men, chxta, i no kno about dat wan sha o!
 
OP
Chxta

Chxta

Onye kwe, Chi ya ekwe
Nov 1, 2004
12,088
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #24
    @ Tom, Lampard has only one discernable skill, hitting the ball hard and accurately from any angle and with miniml run-up. That's it. No creativity, no influence on the game, no outstanding defensive qualities. But he is a hell of a shooter, that much I give him...

    According to last seaso's stats, Ronaldinho had a 4:1 shots to goal ratio, while Lampard had 10:1, and it is already shaping up in that way this season.

    Soon y'all be saying that Stamford Bridge is better than the Bernabeau!

    For y'all who are behaving like kids who never saw Zizou play, please see this and realise that this was a master...
     
    Sep 28, 2002
    13,975
    #25
    at the moment, lampard is better than zidane, who has dont absolutely nothing in past couple of years. yes, obviously he's on class of his own, he's not only the most talented footballer of his generation, but one of the top players ever, but at the moment frankie is miles ahead. he's not spectacular, but he's just like nedved of 02/03, hard working, scoring for fun and giving all to his team and that shows.
     
    OP
    Chxta

    Chxta

    Onye kwe, Chi ya ekwe
    Nov 1, 2004
    12,088
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #26
    ++ [ originally posted by Fliakis ] ++
    oh shut up chxta, your talking rubbish again.


    dont like lampard, but he is a phenomenal player.
    Have nothing to say then huh?
     
    Sep 28, 2002
    13,975
    #27
    ++ [ originally posted by Fliakis ] ++
    at the moment, lampard is better than zidane, who has dont absolutely nothing in past couple of years. yes, obviously he's on class of his own, he's not only the most talented footballer of his generation, but one of the top players ever, but at the moment frankie is miles ahead. he's not spectacular, but he's just like nedved of 02/03, hard working, scoring for fun and giving all to his team and that shows.

    einstein..
     
    OP
    Chxta

    Chxta

    Onye kwe, Chi ya ekwe
    Nov 1, 2004
    12,088
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #28
    ++ [ originally posted by Fliakis ] ++
    at the moment, lampard is better than zidane, who has dont absolutely nothing in past couple of years. yes, obviously he's on class of his own, he's not only the most talented footballer of his generation, but one of the top players ever, but at the moment frankie is miles ahead. he's not spectacular, but he's just like nedved of 02/03, hard working, scoring for fun and giving all to his team and that shows.
    No one said that at the moment Zidane is better than Lampard. If you are confused, then check the title of the thread that brought up the argument here. It says, "Lampard better than Zidane ever was"! And that my friend is blasphemy!

    @ Madlawyer1: Ai no yan sei im dey smok igbo, ai yan sei e fit bi bikos im nefa siddon res sins tey.
     

    #10

    Senior Member
    Jul 28, 2002
    7,377
    #29
    ++ [ originally posted by Chxta ] ++
    @ Tom, Lampard has only one discernable skill, hitting the ball hard and accurately from any angle and with miniml run-up. That's it. No creativity, no influence on the game, no outstanding defensive qualities. But he is a hell of a shooter, that much I give him...

    According to last seaso's stats, Ronaldinho had a 4:1 shots to goal ratio, while Lampard had 10:1, and it is already shaping up in that way this season.

    Soon y'all be saying that Stamford Bridge is better than the Bernabeau!

    For y'all who are behaving like kids who never saw Zizou play, please see this and realise that this was a master...
    Lampards pass and move ethos imho is what runs the chelsea midfield, he may not pick out majestic passes like Zizou but lamps is surely a top class passer of the ball in that the ball is generally retaind when he is in control.

    Zidane is the master, but Lamps is doing something different entirely, he is a box-to-box midfielder, not a straight creative but a allround midfield man.
     
    Feb 26, 2005
    591
    #30
    ++ [ originally posted by Fliakis ] ++
    at the moment, lampard is better than zidane, who has dont absolutely nothing in past couple of years. yes, obviously he's on class of his own, he's not only the most talented footballer of his generation, but one of the top players ever, but at the moment frankie is miles ahead. he's not spectacular, but he's just like nedved of 02/03, hard working, scoring for fun and giving all to his team and that shows.
    Wherein lies your argument? You cannot say in one breath that Zidane is the most talented footballer of his generation, and say in the next that Lampard is miles ahead of him. Why? Because Lampard and Zidane are from different generations. It's apples and oranges.
     

    Tom

    The DJ
    Oct 30, 2001
    11,726
    #31
    ++ [ originally posted by Chxta ] ++
    @ Tom, Lampard has only one discernable skill, hitting the ball hard and accurately from any angle and with miniml run-up. That's it. No creativity, no influence on the game, no outstanding defensive qualities. But he is a hell of a shooter, that much I give him...
    Heresy is defined as "contrary to what is widely acknowledged to be fact" and it is you who cites this word time and time again. Whats ironic is that its only you who can't see how much a brilliant player Lamps is.

    Hitting the ball hard and accurately with minimal run up from any angle. This, alone, is a phenomenal skill to possess yet you write it off as if seemingly irrelevant. You'd rather see Zizou do a 360 degree spin in the centre circle and the crowd shouting olé?

    The we get into this one discernable skill business. Apparently the only skills that matter are possessing other-wordly ball control and close skills. Actual end product is less important.

    So Lampard's other abilities like long range passing, close range finishing, heading, set piece taking, tracking back, being a workaholic, good tackler etc (most of which you fail to even recongise that he possesses) are all worthless?

    I'll be the first to accept he lacks Zizou's close control and technique but he's superior in most other aspects of the game, which is why he's an all round midfielder and ZZ was a playmaker. Different positions require different talents.

    ++ [ originally posted by Chxta ] ++
    According to last seaso's stats, Ronaldinho had a 4:1 shots to goal ratio, while Lampard had 10:1, and it is already shaping up in that way this season.

    Soon y'all be saying that Stamford Bridge is better than the Bernabeau!
    So?

    Do you want me to bring up all the opta stats that would be in favour of Lampard in this argument? Even though this has nothing to do with Ronaldinho? Ronaldinho either plays as a forward or an attacking midfielder? You'd expect him to be the more accurate finisher anyway, surely?

    And it hardly does anything to diminish Lampard's achievements in any case. The only stat that will matter to Mourinho this year is 11 goals, from central midfield. Top scorer in the EPL, and he's a midfielder. Goals win games.

    ++ [ originally posted by Chxta ] ++
    For y'all who are behaving like kids who never saw Zizou play, please see this and realise that this was a master...
    I hope you're not referring to me there. Way to belittle everyone just because they disagree with your opinion on the matter. I think people on this board are well aware of Zidane's mercurial talents.
     
    Feb 26, 2005
    591
    #34
    Look, I don't give a rat's ass about Opta stats. Also, I've never said that Lampard isn't a good player. All I've said is that Lampard simply isn't in Zidane's class.

    And yes to assert otherwise is heresy.
     

    #10

    Senior Member
    Jul 28, 2002
    7,377
    #35
    ++ [ originally posted by madlawyer1 ] ++
    Look, I don't give a rat's ass about Opta stats. Also, I've never said that Lampard isn't a good player. All I've said is that Lampard simply isn't in Zidane's class.

    And yes to assert otherwise is heresy.
    not sure if anyone really disagreed with what u were sayin.
     

    Tom

    The DJ
    Oct 30, 2001
    11,726
    #36
    ++ [ originally posted by madlawyer1 ] ++
    Look, I don't give a rat's ass about Opta stats. Also, I've never said that Lampard isn't a good player. All I've said is that Lampard simply isn't in Zidane's class.

    And yes to assert otherwise is heresy.
    a) It was your buddy chxta who brought stats into it, not me

    b) Still not sure either of you actually know the meaning of that word

    They are different types of player, its hard to say what class they are in unless one of them is brilliant and the other is crap. For example Paramatti is not in the same class as Shevchenko. When two players of different positions are both superb, how can you go on about there being a class difference? Is it just because he can't do a 360 spin or what? He's making the most oft he talents he's been given
     
    Feb 26, 2005
    591
    #37
    ++ [ originally posted by Enron ] ++
    :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:

    Lampard is indeed better. WTF has ZiZu done in the past 5 years beside lose to Senegal?
    ++ [ originally posted by Tom ] ++
    Lampard is miles better than Zidane at this point in time. In fact I'd go as far as saying he's probably the best player in the world (maybe ex. Ronaldinho) at present
    ++ [ originally posted by axlrose85 ] ++
    id take lampard over that bald twit anytime.
    ++ [ originally posted by John #10 ] ++
    not sure if anyone really disagreed with what u were sayin.
    Just so you know.
     
    Feb 26, 2005
    591
    #38
    ++ [ originally posted by Tom ] ++


    a) It was your buddy chxta who brought stats into it, not me

    b) Still not sure either of you actually know the meaning of that word

    They are different types of player, its hard to say what class they are in unless one of them is brilliant and the other is crap. For example Paramatti is not in the same class as Shevchenko. When two players of different positions are both superb, how can you go on about there being a class difference? Is it just because he can't do a 360 spin or what? He's making the most oft he talents he's been given
    I've never said Lampard isn't making good use of his talents. In fact, if you read my second post on this subject, you will easily discover that I actually like Lampard. I think he is a very good footballer. But I do not believe that he and Zidane are in the same class, 360 spin or not.
     
    OP
    Chxta

    Chxta

    Onye kwe, Chi ya ekwe
    Nov 1, 2004
    12,088
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #39
    ++ [ originally posted by Tom ] ++


    Heresy is defined as "contrary to what is widely acknowledged to be fact" and it is you who cites this word time and time again. Whats ironic is that its only you who can't see how much a brilliant player Lamps is.
    I never anywhere said that Lampard is not a good player. If I did, show me. I merely said, and I say it again, he is not the best that there is right now. Kaka is better, Ronaldinho is better, Pirlo is better, at the risk of sounding biased, Vieria is better. You want more? Essien who is his teammate is another one.

    Hitting the ball hard and accurately with minimal run up from any angle. This, alone, is a phenomenal skill to possess yet you write it off as if seemingly irrelevant. You'd rather see Zizou do a 360 degree spin in the centre circle and the crowd shouting olé?
    True, and I was the one who brought up those points which will only aid to punch holes in your argument that I refuse to acknowledge that Lampard is a good player. But you know one thing? Zizou had all those qualities too.

    The we get into this one discernable skill business. Apparently the only skills that matter are possessing other-wordly ball control and close skills. Actual end product is less important.
    Actually yes, end product is less important, and you want to know why? Cruyff had all the skills in the world, Beckenbauer was the more effective captain, who is usually mentioned first when we are talking of all time greats? People tend to remember what made them happy while watching the game, not those who just ran around the pitch for 90 minutes like robots. That is why Zizou's goal against Leverkusen is acknowledged as one of the greatest ever, not because it won the Champion's League, but because of the joy it brought all watching that game, including non-Madrid fans, and I dare say even Leverkusen fans! People remember Maradona's performance in Mexico 86 not because he won the World Cup there, but because of the game against England where he scored that goal (not the Hand of God goal that you English chose to remember all the time, but the other goal. Okocha is adored in Frankfurt, Fernabache, PSG and now Bolton, and worshipped in Nigeria, not because he won us medals or won medals for any of these clubs, but for the fact that he made the people happy.

    So Lampard's other abilities like long range passing, close range finishing, heading, set piece taking, tracking back, being a workaholic, good tackler etc (most of which you fail to even recongise that he possesses) are all worthless?
    Once again Tom, you miss the point. I never said FL didn't have these abilities, but then again, Zizou had all. If memory serves me correct, his 2 goals against Brazil in 1998 were headers. Zizou was once upon a time France's free-kick taker. Who said Zizou never marked? Go back and watch him when he was still with us. Work-rate? Once again I refer you to his time in Turin. Close range finishing? WTF???

    I'll be the first to accept he lacks Zizou's close control and technique but he's superior in most other aspects of the game, which is why he's an all round midfielder and ZZ was a playmaker. Different positions require different talents.
    Admittedly we never really saw te defensive side of Zizou's game, but that was because at any given point in time he had either of Petit, Deschamps, Vieira, Makelele, Tacchinardi, Davids or even Birindelli behind him. I hear someone say doesn't Lampard have Makelele behind him now? I hear another what happened to Zizou when Makelele left Madrid. It is this simple, age. Lampard had defensive duties last season because let's face it, Makelele is not the player he used to be when he was at Madrid. Same as Zizou after Makelele left. How often have we seen Lampard playing the defensive midfielder since the arrival of Essien? How often have we seen Poland and Northern Ireland tear through the England middle because Lampard didn't have players of equal stature beside him in an England jersey?



    So?

    Do you want me to bring up all the opta stats that would be in favour of Lampard in this argument? Even though this has nothing to do with Ronaldinho? Ronaldinho either plays as a forward or an attacking midfielder? You'd expect him to be the more accurate finisher anyway, surely?
    Bring the stats. Please include the source URLs too. Ai ful gran

    And it hardly does anything to diminish Lampard's achievements in any case. The only stat that will matter to Mourinho this year is 11 goals, from central midfield. Top scorer in the EPL, and he's a midfielder. Goals win games.
    Shey it was in this thread that I mentioned that Chelsea's modus operandi includes booting the ball route one to Drogba who heckles defenders, he rebound falls to Lampard who shoots.

    I hope you're not referring to me there. Way to belittle everyone just because they disagree with your opinion on the matter. I think people on this board are well aware of Zidane's mercurial talents.
    My apologies if that offended you.
     
    Feb 26, 2005
    591
    #40
    class ( P ) Pronunciation Key (kls) n.

    1. A set, collection, group, or configuration containing members regarded as having certain attributes or traits in common; a kind or category.
    2. A division based on quality, rank, or grade
    , as:
    1. A grade of mail: a package sent third class.
    2. A quality of accommodation on public transport: tourist class.
    3.
    1. A social stratum whose members share certain economic, social, or cultural characteristics: the lower-income classes.
    2. Social rank or caste, especially high rank.
    3. Informal. Elegance of style, taste, and manner: an actor with class.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)