Franck Ribery (7 Viewers)
- Thread starter Pinturrichio
- Start date
That's absolutely right.
If we seriously want the most similar type of player we can find to replace Nedved, Ribery would be the answer. However, if we want somebody with a little more craft and creativity, Quaresma would also be a good choice because he certainly has talent. I would take either one but we'll most likely end up getting neither.
But whatever the case, we need to inject some creativity and top-notch youth into our midfield.
If we seriously want the most similar type of player we can find to replace Nedved, Ribery would be the answer. However, if we want somebody with a little more craft and creativity, Quaresma would also be a good choice because he certainly has talent. I would take either one but we'll most likely end up getting neither.
But whatever the case, we need to inject some creativity and top-notch youth into our midfield.
To me its not always about the skills you have, but how you use them effectively on the pitch.
Ribery combines speed, agility and technique in a very effective game, and can be a real threat with his runs/drives on the wings.
I'm hoping though Juve decide to have an AMC, its been a while since we have a player in that position and honestly Diego is impressive there.
Ribery combines speed, agility and technique in a very effective game, and can be a real threat with his runs/drives on the wings.
I'm hoping though Juve decide to have an AMC, its been a while since we have a player in that position and honestly Diego is impressive there.
It's clearly obvious that many people here are unaware of the portuguese super league as they are of the french ligue 1 so there's no point arguing who's better quaresma or ribery. i respect ppl's opinion over ribery but nationalities,reputation etc apart, I'd go for quaresma and that's it for me on this thread
They both have skills in dribbling ,ball control and play making BUT
Ribery is better in pace (both in short and long distances) ,ribery is better in team work meantality and ribery could play as aplaymaker easier ,In counter attacks that ribery is like a wild stallion(or speedy gonzalez or road runner for looney toones fans)and finally i guess ribery expenses wont exceeds that of quaresma
Quaresma is hell of a talent in ball control and dribbling he is better than ribery in ball control specially in naroow spaces near the box ,but somtimes he plays for himself and controls the ball too much and that is a fatal mistake for a playmaker so we could only use him in the flanks only
Ribery is better in pace (both in short and long distances) ,ribery is better in team work meantality and ribery could play as aplaymaker easier ,In counter attacks that ribery is like a wild stallion(or speedy gonzalez or road runner for looney toones fans)and finally i guess ribery expenses wont exceeds that of quaresma
Quaresma is hell of a talent in ball control and dribbling he is better than ribery in ball control specially in naroow spaces near the box ,but somtimes he plays for himself and controls the ball too much and that is a fatal mistake for a playmaker so we could only use him in the flanks only