[FML] Serie A 2009/2010 (13 Viewers)

Mar 24, 2006
13,962
I think that title was awarded by the FIGC to Inter(the highest place team that did not break the rules), I don't remember anything being stolen.
See who's speaking ?
Moronho's fan and merda's bandwagon fans , and the most intersting thing is , he has a great nickname "Bansheeboy86" :howler:

Stop your bullshit , we were , is and will be the best , miles ahead from your pathetic team .

Vaffanculo interMERDA OLE OLE OLE
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
May 25, 2009
94
Are you saying season 04-05 and specially 05-06 we didn't win the titles on the pitch deservedly? Like with the squad we were having and the way we were playing in the league we needed any help to win the titles?
No I'm not saying you didn't deserve it on the pitch, all I was alluding to is that Inter didn't steal it as you claimed, it was given to us by the FIGC. I wasn't offering an opinion on it, I was merely stating the fact of what happened.
 

pitbull

Senior Member
Jul 26, 2007
11,045
I thought I'd never experience a day where Inter fan shows more class than three Juventus fans put together, some of the posts by juventini in this thread are just low. I'd like to see that interista post more, but obviously Azzurri7 will ban him at the first chance. This discussion reminds me of , but Rab clearly ain't DP here.
 

JBF

اختك يا زمن
Aug 5, 2006
18,451
I thought I'd never experience a day where Inter fan shows more class than three Juventus fans put together, some of the posts by juventini in this thread are just low. I'd like to see that interista post more, but obviously Azzurri7 will ban him at the first chance. This discussion reminds me of this, but Rab clearly ain't DP here.
Well you didn't see those post of his before being edited. Believe me if you had you would understand why he deserves a ban.

And ffs, what is the sense of posting in a forum that essentially belongs to a team you hate so much that you placed at the top of that hated list of his, other than provoking them..Which he clearly is doing brilliantly.
 

pitbull

Senior Member
Jul 26, 2007
11,045
Well you didn't see those post of his before being edited. Believe me if you had you would understand why he deserves a ban.

And ffs, what is the sense of posting in a forum that essentially belongs to a team you hate so much that you placed at the top of that hated list of his, other than provoking them..Which he clearly is doing brilliantly.
oh, well then that may be the case.

many here acts like they hate half of our players, coach, staff, board and everything, so it's nothing new.
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,108
Well you didn't see those post of his before being edited. Believe me if you had you would understand why he deserves a ban.

And ffs, what is the sense of posting in a forum that essentially belongs to a team you hate so much that you placed at the top of that hated list of his, other than provoking them..Which he clearly is doing brilliantly.
Other and biggest Juve forums like VS and J1987 have all the fans. There's nothing wrong with it. It's sometimes good to debate but most of the time people act like 12yo when they see Inter or any other fans.

He can stay as long as he doesn't break any rule and people should not even mock him. If you think any less of them no need to go on 'their' level then. Leave it.
 

JBF

اختك يا زمن
Aug 5, 2006
18,451
Other and biggest Juve forums like VS and J1987 have all the fans. There's nothing wrong with it. It's sometimes good to debate but most of the time people act like 12yo when they see Inter or any other fans.

He can stay as long as he doesn't break any rule and people should not even mock him. If you think any less of them no need to go on 'their' level then. Leave it.
Im not against him staying, actually I agree with what you said about him and how you defended him once he got here.
I even saw one post of his where he was bashing Juve , and once I saw that he edited it I didnt submit my reply.

All I was arguing about is the fact that he's posting here while I find no logical reason for him doing so.
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,108
Im not against him staying, actually I agree with what you said about him and how you defended him once he got here.
I even saw one post of his where he was bashing Juve , and once I saw that he edited it I didnt submit my reply.
But he did edit it. Once he posts something bad and against rules there aren't going to be any double standards and he's going to get his ban. But for now he stays and there's no reason to bash him nor ban him.

All I was arguing about is the fact that he's posting here while I find no logical reason for him doing so.
Fred has 17k posts, Aaron has 27k posts while Burke has over 50k. None of them support Juve but they do add a lot here. Some post for fun (like Burke) and the other two offer good football debates.
 

JBF

اختك يا زمن
Aug 5, 2006
18,451
But he did edit it. Once he posts something bad and against rules there aren't going to be any double standards and he's going to get his ban. But for now he stays and there's no reason to bash him nor ban him.



Fred has 17k posts, Aaron has 27k posts while Burke has over 50k. None of them support Juve but they do add a lot here. Some post for fun (like Burke) and the other two offer good football debates.
Im not saying you shouldn't do that :tup:


None of them hate Juve, right?
 

Raz

Senior Member
Nov 20, 2005
12,218
But he did edit it. Once he posts something bad and against rules there aren't going to be any double standards and he's going to get his ban. But for now he stays and there's no reason to bash him nor ban him.



Fred has 17k posts, Aaron has 27k posts while Burke has over 50k. None of them support Juve but they do add a lot here. Some post for fun (like Burke) and the other two offer good football debates.
Double stadards? just look at Azzurri7 first reply to the inter guy. I suppose if it were other way around the inter guy wouldn't be banned too? Talk about double standards...
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 13)