Andries, you might be having fun, but this has gone miles off topic, and is deteriorating into either an arguement or a lovefest, depending on how serious you two are.
Does anyone else think Deco may have played poorly for Portugal because he was at the front of an attacking midfield rather than a defensive one, as he is at Porto? I've seen that kind of thing make a difference before.
Expecially in the final, he looked uncomfortable on the ball, unsure about his positioning and distribution.
TBH mikhail, I've never been a big fan of Deco, but do agree with you. I think the Porto system where the play is based around him suited him better than the NT one, where you have Figo, Ronaldo and Rui.
++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++
TBH mikhail, I've never been a big fan of Deco, but do agree with you. I think the Porto system where the play is based around him suited him better than the NT one, where you have Figo, Ronaldo and Rui.
To be fair, he almost never played at the same time as Rui Costa, so it's less a case that he's got less space, than he's just unfamiliar with the system of play. If that truely is the case, is it fair to say that Scholari failed big-time as the coach in that he didn't fix the flaw in Deco's game and he didn't drop him?
++ [ originally posted by AndriesGobert ] ++
Thank you Stuart. It was a hard fought episode. I'd now like to thank all of my fans and friends...well.. that's about it for my speech.
And it's relevant because the Greek obviously are less talented than other nations. So we should decide whether hard work or sheer talent is the most important thing.
Personally I think Rui Costa should have played right from the start in the final. Did you see how he played when he finally entered? He was by far the best Portuguese player. And Deco, though he's a very good player, isn't cut out for a Rui Costa-role. Rui Costa still is your traditional playmaker and I think that had he played from the start, Portugal would have walked away with the win.