Final | Portugal - Greece (3 Viewers)

[Cronios]

everybody sould also consider this,
there is a diferense between league and cup.
league can show us the best win,
by the time champions league isn t a league anymore we will see finals like porto-monaco.
the cup involves luck,a lot,
an underform of a big player,a red card, a penalty, a minor acc may disqualify a team,
a better team that souldn t go like this.
so all the teams in a cup strugle, sould be very carefull and very constant,the Czechs werent perfect,they souldn t lose by any mean,its there fault and only,it doesnt matter if yr opponent is france or malta,
u sould always be after the win
and never loose if u wonna go further,
this is priority one.
amuse the funs goes after(even greece would start dribbling after winning3-0)
the one who will achieve this, by any means, worths to be the cup winner.
by this point of view Greece was the best team.
deny this
and deny every cup winner so far!
if u are interested to really see the best team u sould make a league-championship on them!

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Seven]

Fine, a league-championship it is then.

 

[Seven]

++ [ originally posted by gray ] ++
Latvia weren't that bad, they played well against the Czechs and should have had 3 penalties against Germany. They were actually quite strong, especially when they shocked Turkey to qualify

Oh god, fine. Did you have a good time looking at Latvia? Don't think so. I look at the European Championship because I want to see players do things I can't do. I can do what the players of Latvia do.

 

[gray]

++ [ originally posted by AndriesGobert ] ++
Oh god, fine. Did you have a good time looking at Latvia? Don't think so. I look at the European Championship because I want to see players do things I can't do. I can do what the players of Latvia do.

I didn't have a good time looking at Greece either, and I could probably do a lot of what the Greek players did... but look where it got them

 

[Elnur_E65]

++ [ originally posted by gray ] ++

I didn't have a good time looking at Greece either, and I could probably do a lot of what the Greek players did... but look where it got them

Then you should be playing for Panatinaikos, and not writing on Juventuz Forums

 

[Seven]

++ [ originally posted by gray ] ++

I didn't have a good looking at Greece either, and I could probably do a lot of what the Greek players did... but look where it got them

Yes, indeed, but that's not why you look at professional football. I don't need to see other people do what I can do myself. That's just useless. I want to look at players like Del Piero, Rui Costa, Zidane and Beckham in admiration. Or I want to look at a team in admiration (like Italy in 2000 or France in 98). I do not want to look at a team that isn't capable of doing anything special.

 

[gray]

++ [ originally posted by Pendir_E65 ] ++
Then you should be playing for Panatinaikos, and not writing on Juventuz Forums

Naaah... I had an offer, but I don't like their jersey

 

[Seven]

++ [ originally posted by Pendir_E65 ] ++


Then you should be playing for Panatinaikos, and noton Juventuz Forums

I'll keep that in mind. I'll send you a card when I'm playing for Panathinaikos in 2 years.

I mean I can do what they do, but slower. I cannot do what Del Piero can do.

 

[Seven]

Football players can be compared to the gladiators in the Roman time. They're there to amuse the crowd. That's not what Greece did. Sorry guys, football really isn't that much about winning. Athletics and cycling and stuff like that are. Football is just a game, it isn't an actual sport.

 

[gray]

++ [ originally posted by AndriesGobert ] ++
Sorry guys, football really isn't that much about winning. Athletics and cycling and stuff like that are. Football is just a game, it isn't an actual sport.

:wth: are you serious? What makes you think football is any less competitive?

 

[Elnur_E65]

++ [ originally posted by AndriesGobert ] ++


I'll keep that in mind. I'll send you a card when I'm playing for Panathinaikos in 2 years.

I actually wrote that to Gray when he said he can play as well as the Greek NT did

 

[Elnur_E65]

++ [ originally posted by AndriesGobert ] ++
Football players can be compared to the gladiators in the Roman time. They're there to amuse the crowd. That's not what Greece did. Sorry guys, football really isn't that much about winning. Athletics and cycling and stuff like that are. Football is just a game, it isn't an actual sport.

Hmmm... ok... if football isn't about winning... what is it about?

 

[Dan]

++ [ originally posted by MCPIERO ] ++
Why did the fool run face first into the netting:LOL::LOL: He had good pace though

thats what i was thinking, wow this guy has got speed... and then he breaks the eventful run by jumping into the net

 

[Zlatan]

++ [ originally posted by gray ] ++

You should've made yourself clearer in the first place

Oh I'm sorry, I thought quoting someone's post meant that you were adderssing them

Yeah, but thatd last comment was in general, and it was the only example I could think of, altho probably a bit out of place.



Sooreeey mate [/australian accent]

 

[Seven]

++ [ originally posted by gray ] ++

:wth: are you serious? What makes you think is any less competitive?

Mainly because football players train less and don't need medals in order that they wouldn't be forgotten. Football is about amusing the crowd, whereas other sports aren't. Well, they are, but to a lesser extent.

 

[Seven]

++ [ originally posted by Pendir_E65 ] ++


Hmmm... ok... if football isn't about winning... what is it about?

I said that in the part you quoted. Perhaps you should read before you quote and comment.

 

[BigIzz]

Greece may not have been the most talented team at Euro (they probably weren't in the top 10 even) but you can't deny that they played like the best TEAM. Imagine if France or Italy played as a team, played as hugry as Greece did. They would have been unstoppable.

 

[Elnur_E65]

++ [ originally posted by aressandro10 ] ++
if Azerbaijan and Belarus goes to the world cup final they clearly plays better than Italy-Brazil...so why not?

++ [ originally posted by AndriesGobert ] ++
They clearly won't play better. Neither did Greece play better than the Czech Republic or France.

How can you be so DAMN sure?

 

[mikhail]

++ [ originally posted by Pendir_E65 ] ++
Hmmm... ok... if football isn't about winning... what is it about?

If you've ever seen a great Brazil team in full flight, you should already know the answer to that.

 

[Elnur_E65]

++ [ originally posted by AndriesGobert ] ++
I said that in the part you quoted. Perhaps you should read before you quote and comment.

1. I always read before I quote and comment.

2. Here is what you've written:
"Football players can be compared to the gladiators in the Roman time. They're there to amuse the crowd. That's not what Greece did. Sorry guys, football really isn't that much about winning. Athletics and cycling and stuff like that are. Football is just a game, it isn't an actual sport".

See, your word "they" in front line is applicable to the word "gladiators in the Roman time", because it is the latter in that sentence, and not the “football players”.

To me that is not an answer to a question “What is football about”. It only says "Gladiators amuse the crowd". So going back to college and taking some English lessons wouldn't hurt you at all.

So, since unlike you, I don't make assumptions about things I see, I simply did not understand what you mean.