Fabio Quagliarella (103 Viewers)

Would you keep Quagliarella?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe


Results are only viewable after voting.

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
TEAMQUAG WE DID IT :touched::touched::touched::touched:

:chin:

@baggio @Tommy @Mr Chocolate @Sheik Yerbouti @bonBon @LiquidPLP @Oz_Bianconero88

and anyone else I've forgotten

:chin:
Thanks brahski. But this was never about one player vs the other. They both deserved to remain, even though unfortunately neither of them would figure prominently in Conte's plans. Let's see how the situation develops with Llorente, coz I feel there's more likelihood of Tevez-Quag clicking than Tevez-Gio, incase Vucinic is benched or injured. Either way, let's wait and see what the player himself wants by close of window. If he does stay, then it's good for us coz we'll be well stacked in attack. I'm still sorry Matri left though. Should've been Gio.


Tevez-Vucinic

Giovinco-Llorente

Quag (Break glass in case of emergency when you need someone to score a goal from half)
I don't think it works like that really. These combinations and requirements off the bench vary according to the in match situations. If Quag stays, I expect him to be used quite a bit. Also I genuinely think he'd make a good pair with Tevez as he had done with Il Maestro.

“Matri? We’ve always said six strikers were too many, there is the Milan opportunity and we will evaluate it. The matter has already progressed quite far. If Matri leaves, then Fabio Quagliarella will remain.”

:chin:
Remember he had said less than a month ago that 2 strikers would leave coz we want to give our youth a chance as the fifth forward? Although, I have to say I suspect we are keeping a bit of muscle on the fifth striker coz of the Llorente situation. That might also be a wise thing to do and that's where the strategy may have changed.

- - - Updated - - -

Considering the offers for Quag were only 7-8m I doubt we would sell for that only to replace him with some cack forvet like denis
I think Juve refused more offers for Quag than he did for himself. To the best of my knowledge they rejected Norwich before the player did. And while he accepted West Ham, they rejected the loan proposal.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,892
Considering the offers for Quag were only 7-8m I doubt we would sell for that only to replace him with some cack forvet like denis
Yeah, but 4th/5th striker is always a difficult one. No top striker will stay in the role, and you risk hindering the development of a young prospect.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,892
Everyone knows that anyway, but he might as well stay rather than signing an equivalent. But at which point does someone like Gabbiadini figure? It's a waste of time giving him 15 bit part games.
 

donpiero

Stella D'Argento
Jul 3, 2009
3,370
Well now that it seems he's staying as the 5th striker, he should spend some of that money he's leeching off Juve, and buy a more comfortable armchair for his new and permanent residence on bench:
 

ZoSo

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2011
41,656
Well now that it seems he's staying as the 5th striker, he should spend some of that money he's leeching off Juve, and buy a more comfortable armchair for his new and permanent residence on bench:
Scoring 13 goals + 4 assists is leeching off Juve.

Keep up the good work donpiero.

:chin:

Just sit and admire
 

donpiero

Stella D'Argento
Jul 3, 2009
3,370
Scoring 13 goals + 4 assists is leeching off Juve.

Keep up the good work donpiero.

Just sit and admire
Refusing all transfer offers when you know you will be getting the minimum possible playing time, while on a high wage you definitely don't deserve as a 5th striker is leeching imo.
Anyways I don't really mind, cuz it's obvious he's as good as non existent from now on, in our serious objectives (CL, Serie A). Let him rot, who cares.
Oh and these fanboy pussies sending me -reps are pretty funny. Keep up your class act guys. :D
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 102)