Fabio Quagliarella (140 Viewers)

Would you keep Quagliarella?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe


Results are only viewable after voting.

jukazem

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2007
4,964
We need improvements on Giovinco, Pepe or Vucinic. Quagliarella is absolutely unnecessary. The only reason for keeping him should be holding out for an outright sell or higher transfer fee.
 

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,084
We need improvements on Giovinco, Pepe or Vucinic. Quagliarella is absolutely unnecessary. The only reason for keeping him should be holding out for an outright sell or higher transfer fee.
None will happen. He will get less playing time this season, he will be one year older and less goals to show for it. I'm afraid next season he will end up being one of those player that will be impossible to sell and teams will only take him on loan like many of the players we've wanted to sell before.
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
Look, who cares if he's a better striker than Messi? the only thing that matters is, what Conte thinks of him and all evidence indicate that he doesn't rate Quag. So he is the 5th striker at Conte's Juve whether you like it or not, if you think otherwise then you're delusional.

So what were the options for this kind of side-lined striker? Money (Qatari club) or some small club (where he'd get all the playing time he wants to prove his exceptional qualities, while earning a decent wage, like Sunderland), he refused both.

He should've gone when he had the chance but he didn't, instead opted to just sit on the bench watching CL/most of serie A games from there. The only reasons I can think of for this, is that either he is a leech a la Iaquinta, likes where he is at and doesn't really care for playing time anymore,
or has a sever case of grandeur delusion and is hoping that by some outstretched miracles (like Llorente flopping and other strikers getting injured) he goes back to the starting line up (where he never really was part of, under Conte by the way), and prove to the world what a great and magnificent player he is.

It seems to me that his fanboys are rooting for the same here too, which is a pitty.
Anyways, good luck to you and your Qboy with that.
You clearly didn't read the part where I said that Juve rejected Norwich before the player did, and more recently West Ham, a club that the player accepted but who weren't offering terms suitable to the club.

You also surprisingly forget that Iaquinta was on almost one and half to two times the wage of Quag, making it an amount that is affordable by other clubs. Including the likes of Sunderland, Norwich, West Ham and Al Gharafa who offered him more money to leech off.

You can hate on the player, with all your hyperbole bullshit or you can just accept that if he stays he will climb the ranks just like he did last season, when Conte didn't rate him.

Surely, logic isn't something you enjoy.

- - - Updated - - -

Everyone knows that anyway, but he might as well stay rather than signing an equivalent. But at which point does someone like Gabbiadini figure? It's a waste of time giving him 15 bit part games.
You sound a bit upset that Matri left instead of Quag. Didn't know you had a preference of one player over the other, given that you normally rated them about the same. Interesting.
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,526
We should keep Quag. He has the x-factor. But idk what the fuck Giovinco is doing here. I don't see any clubs offering over 5 mill for him so I guess that explains it.
 

Salvo

J
Moderator
Dec 17, 2007
62,790
Giovinco is not useless, we can't rely on him to be the star but he will have a good contribution this season. Everyone just likes to blab on about the same shit all the time. If Quag stays he will do well, but he won't get a lot of playing time. So he might want to go.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 138)