Fabio Quagliarella (93 Viewers)

Would you keep Quagliarella?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe


Results are only viewable after voting.

Boksic

Senior Member
May 11, 2005
14,300
I guess we need to shift off the surplus upfront.

My only worry is that we will have one very untested/inconsistent attack next season. I wouldn't really class any of the strikers remaining after sales of Quag and Matri as goalscorers which is a bit of a worry considering that is our main problem.
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
i dont think we can ever get a decent sum on Quaq at this age.
If we loan him, they will propose us to keep for a ridculous ammount next, year and after he is yet more older and yet more difficult to be sold (just like we suffered with Melo)
If we sell him now, we must accept a very low fee, its a lose lose situation, we must accept that, and choose the lesser evil.
I believe that we will keep him till the end and sell Matri, who can generate an ammount of cash, probably near the half we have given to get him, not so long ago...
 

Hydde

Minimiliano Tristelli
Mar 6, 2003
38,985
the sad thing is that we are selling both quag or matri.... while still Giovico stays.

Sadly our little guy has cero chance in this team and with tevez here, is not useful for us anymore.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
He needs to go, as he is surplus.

But its sad to see matri and quag, who did their effords today once again, are going, whilst giovinco is staying

Today, a primavera striker showed more in one half, then he had done in the whole preseason
 

LiquidPLP

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2012
12,237
Giovinco will be gone next year if he doesn't prove himself this season. He's younger and he's here for not so long that's why he's lucky enough to stay here a little bit longer. We'll see.
 

Hydde

Minimiliano Tristelli
Mar 6, 2003
38,985
Gio will ned to be outstanding to stay with us by the end of this season.

Im pretty pretty sure that we are not alone in our thinking.... Some of the Juve dudes are thinking the same for sure.-
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
He's only here because we won't recover what we paid for him last season. Needs to up his value. I don't see Gio stay beyond next year, especially if Conte persists with the 352 and doesn't switch to a more wing centric formation. Gio could be a trading chip next season, or hopefully raise cash for Jojo who may want to return to Italy next season post his EpL failure. :D
 

Hydde

Minimiliano Tristelli
Mar 6, 2003
38,985
yup, pretty sure is for that.... but we need to seel 2 dudes and i dont want quags to go...he can be pretty useful.

5 forwards will be too much... taking in consideration all of them could be starters in any team, yeh im counting gio too.... that will bring problems in one way or another because at the very least one of them will get almost no minutes, and one of them will get his value decreased from the amount of bench warming.

If our plan is to stay with Giovinco to increase his value... thats not going to happen... not at all. He will get so little play it will be not funny.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 93)