Fabio Quagliarella (95 Viewers)

Would you keep Quagliarella?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe


Results are only viewable after voting.

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
Well, Giovinco is so skilful that he actually gets to those chances in the first place. Usually he's a huge part of the chance he actually ends up missing.

Gio offers so much more than goalscoring which Quag for example doesn't, and to be honest, Quag ain't no poacher so its not like we're missing out on Trezeguet finishing ability.
That's the whole point. We already have somebody who offers so much more than goalscoring, and that is Vucinic. He not only has greater agility and finesse, he also has much much greater physicality which makes him pliable against all sorts of opponents. So we don't need somebody to do the same thing in the final third. We need somebody to convert those created chances.

Quag may not be a poacher, but factually he remains the only one returning with the kind of stats that suggest he's the closest thing we have to one. And on top of that, he actually has some ability and finesse to go with the finishing, which makes him a better choice, for a more complete attack.

- - - Updated - - -

Quag doesn't have the same amount of playing time because Conte doesn't think he deserves it.
Quag had almost certainly benched Giovinco, till he lost his cool. And besides, it is hardly an argument because the same Conte who according to you prefers Gio, preferred Borriello last season. it's not the talent that's in question. It's tactical issues, which is what is adhered to. And as the season progresses, you'll see Quag will make an impact. Gio has hardly suggested himself to be a world class exploit with all the opportunity he's gotten. I'm a fan, like you, but again, there is nothing in Gio's reportoire except your bias to suggest he's more of what we need.
 

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,086
That's the whole point. We already have somebody who offers so much more than goalscoring, and that is Vucinic. He not only has greater agility and finesse, he also has much much greater physicality which makes him pliable against all sorts of opponents. So we don't need somebody to do the same thing in the final third. We need somebody to convert those created chances.

Quag may not be a poacher, but factually he remains the only one returning with the kind of stats that suggest he's the closest thing we have to one. And on top of that, he actually has some ability and finesse to go with the finishing, which makes him a better choice, for a more complete attack.
Ok baggio..but I'm not doing this again.
 

Juve_fanatic

Second coolest member!
Apr 5, 2006
7,618
I was frustrated today a lot because his teammates didnt pass the ball to him couple of times. Especially that Vidal shot near the end of the game. If our players were a bit more concentrated today and didnt wont personal glory, Quags would have scored two goals.
 

ZoSo

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2011
41,656
Quag 9 goals, 691 minutes. 1 goal per 76.8 minutes.

Gio 8 goals, 1598 minutes. 1 goal per 199.75 minutes.

In the same amount of time that it takes Gio to score 1 goal, Quag will score 2-3 goals.
 

Goodfella

Senior Member
Nov 11, 2012
4,518
lol what?

He gave Matri a highfive and seemingly dissapointed walked up to the seat? What's wrong with that, on a day when nothing works for you?

The only thing that bothered me about that video was that he didn't highfive that kid, which was pretty assholish to do, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and hope that he just didn't notice it.
 

Juliano13

Senior Member
May 6, 2012
5,017
lol what?

He gave Matri a highfive and seemingly dissapointed walked up to the seat? What's wrong with that, on a day when nothing works for you?

The only thing that bothered me about that video was that he didn't highfive that kid, which was pretty assholish to do, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and hope that he just didn't notice it.
So you don't see him covering his mouth with his jacket and talking at the end of the video?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 93)