Fabio Quagliarella (59 Viewers)

Would you keep Quagliarella?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe


Results are only viewable after voting.

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
Another lively performance. This guy needs to start seeing more game time. Vucinic has had his chance and blown it. Quag-Del Piero deserve to start fixing shit around these parts.
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
Just like expected.
If you thought his skill and performance didn't work for you today but felt Boriello had an impact in the last game, get help. Or take your blinkers off.

I'm not being biased when I say he and Giach were the liveliest two individuals on the pitch once they came on. Quag was falling back almost near our d to help build up play. WTF are you talking about man?!
 

Fake Melo

Ghost Division
Sep 3, 2010
37,077
If you thought his skill and performance didn't work for you today but felt Boriello had an impact in the last game, get help. Or take your blinkers off.

I'm not being biased when I say he and Giach were the liveliest two individuals on the pitch once they came on. Quag was falling back almost near our d to help build up play. WTF are you talking about man?!
I didn't even mention Borriello. Defensiv much?
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
I didn't even mention Borriello. Defensiv much?
Learn to read. And write.

You mentioned how Borriello did as much or as little as Quag in our last outing. And obviously missed his game today. In which, again, he did in fifteen minutes what are forwards failed to do the entire game. His passing and movement was fantastic and he warrants a start in our next match. Now go dive into another thread.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,998
Learn to read. And write.

You mentioned how Borriello did as much or as little as Quag in our last outing. And obviously missed his game today. In which, again, he did in fifteen minutes what are forwards failed to do the entire game. His passing and movement was fantastic and he warrants a start in our next match. Now go dive into another thread.
He only brought fresh legs, nothing else.
He must get more starts so we could see if he can replicate his last year's performances but from what he's showing us in the little time he got this season, he doesn't look good at all. More like his average self than his freak first part of last season.
He's doing not better nor worse than anyone from our attack.
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
He only brought fresh legs, nothing else.
He must get more starts so we could see if he can replicate his last year's performances but from what he's showing us in the little time he got this season, he doesn't look good at all. More like his average self than his freak first part of last season.
He's doing not better nor worse than anyone from our attack.
What were you expecting from a sub brought on in the 70th minute? He ran, dropped back to help the defense, built up play from deep, galvanised the movement up front. Surely, you couldn't have judged him to be 'not good at all' in the playing time that he's been getting. Fifteen minutes every week. Vucinic if anything is beginning to show signs of what we've all feared from the start. There is nothing he is doing to suggest that he deserves to be starting and playing entire games without giving guys like Quag and Alex a shot, who at 37 years of age proves to be a bigger threat than Vucinic has been for a while now. There is no doubt in my mind, that Quag will be a more dynamic presence upfront if given the amount of unquestioned playing time Mirko has been getting. And anyway, now that you've mentioned this, being our resident statistician, let's pull out some stats on what the two have done in comparison to each other along with the minutes thyeve gotten. Would make for an interesting analysis. (if possible that is) :)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 58)