Did you not see the word "almost" there? Did you not think that it was put intentionally?
I assumed we all watch Italian football here, so my assumption was that when i said almost, everybody will understand why the word "almost" was there. Well it looks like i have to spell it out for you after all. Other than the Sweden- Italy game in Euro 2004 and the Inter- Milan game of 2006-2007 most Nesta - Zlatan duels ended up for the former.
I have to ask you again Fred: Do you have a clue what are you talking about?
Lets see:
In the last two seasons Nesta didn't play vs Zlatan. In the season before that Inter were all over Milan and comfortably won both matches and Zlatan scored on both matches (for 3:0 in the first match and for 2:1, the winner, in the second match).
This leaves us with Zlatan in Juve. On two of the 4 matches in those 2 seasons Zlatan didn't play. Once he was suspended for 3 matches and he missed the Milan-Juve match (the one Juve won with Trez's header) and once he was injured.
This leaves us with two more matches and Zlatan was indeed owned here, but not by Nesta because Nesta wasn't marking Zlatan.
Who was marking Zlatan then on those two matches?
The answer goes in your favor if you wanna say that Zlatan choked there, because the guy who was marking him was the 40 years old Costacurta. Milan fans still enjoy the thought of Costacurta completly shuting Zlatan down. But in this particular discussion we're having it makes no difference because it wasn't Nesta.
Yes, otherwise i wouldn't have mentioned it. Antares said it more than once.